New push for more bans in California

Don't know if there's any such thing as a "new push" for gun control legislation in Kalifornia. Just one perpetual motion anti-gun legislative machine that introduces one law after another, with pauses in between while the socialist agenda attacks something else.
 
You know you need to move to a different state when...
You put a 30 round PMag in your "cart" and it says...

Restrictions that May Apply:
Cannot Ship:
•California
•New York
•New Jersey
•Maryland

Thank God I live in one of the "free" states of the USA. :)
 
Bud Helms said:
What the heck is a "bullet button"? A magazine release?

Yep. A Bullet Button is a modified magazine release. IIRC any rifle with a pistol grip must have a permanently attached magazine. The Bullet Button is installed in place of your magazine release. It requires a tool to activate the release. The idea is that the magazine is still considered permanently attached but it does not take 20 minutes to remove it. Often they are designed so that a cartridge can be used to operate them, hence the name Bullet Button.

If you want a lesson in bureaucracy read up on California gun laws. They are among the most poorly thought out, ineffective, needlessly complex, politically motivated, ridiculous laws in our country.
 
seems to me this is unreasonably denying the people their right to bear arms by way of requiring that a major component of the firearm is disabled.
 
I am sure that the illegal weapons on the streets are all converted to use the bullet button. If not that would be a crime.... Criminals wouldn't break the law....ever... <sarcasm> While the state might be beautiful, they can keep the effing place. I really have no respect for their elected officials or their voters forballowing this... Hence I have no business there...
 
There seems to be different opinions floating around, so I looked at SB249, as Amended to date. Essentially it staes:

This bill would, commencing July 1, 2013, and with certain
exceptions, prohibit any person from importing, making, selling, loaning,
transferring, or possessing any conversion kit, as defined, designed
solely and exclusively to convert certain firearms with a fixed magazine
into firearms with the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and
other features making the firearm an assault weapon and would make
violations subject to criminal penalties.

This bill seems to address changing a fixed magazine 'Assault Rifle' into an 'Assault Rifle' with a removable magazine. I have read of SKS having such a kit. Are there any other 'Assault Rifles' with fixed magazine ?

I cannot see where this 'Bullet Button' idea came from. I could not even find the term in SB249.
 
Are there any other 'Assault Rifles' with fixed magazine ?
I've never seen one in person, but what about those "California
Approved" arms such as M1A's and AR's I've seen on places such as Buds? Are those constructed in such a way that the magazine is non-removable, or not easily removed? If so, how does one load their AR? Do they have to remove the rear take-down pin and make it a 'breakover' semi automatic sporting arm?
 
‘Bullet Button Ban’

Wow! Just WOW!

I am awed!!!

‘Bullet Button Ban’ has it all! It’s fun to say. It’s got ‘bullet’ in the phrase which is sexy! And it’s got alliteration!

Plus after the ‘Bullet Button Ban’ law is passed to require the ‘Bullet Button’ to be welded down-

(and couldn’t we please find some victim whose name starts with ‘B’ so it could be named the ‘Brady’s Bullet Button Ban’ law or ‘Billie’s Bullet Button Ban’ law…)

-the bullet button could be redefined to mean NOT the magazine release, but the TRIGGER!
 
Bullet button pain in the...

I have a California Compliant "Bullet Button" carbine. In place of the magazine release, it has a fixed button with a small hole. To release the magazine you insert a tool (the tip of a .223 Remington cartridge will do nicely) and the magazine drops out.

This law would make it a felony to have the parts to put the original magazine release back on the gun. Or a magnetic tool that would permanently stick to the gun would also get you in felonious trouble.

This is why I bought my Remington 7615. It accepts AR15 magazines but is a pump action rifle so I have the regular magazine release.

So, in California we are limited to 10 rounds maximum capacity, all Center Fire rifles with a pistol grip must have a fixed magazine. A fixed magazine requires a tool to remove. Lawsuits have won the “Bullet Button” concept where a bullet tip is considered a tool when removing a magazine.

See http://www.ehow.com/info_7853912_laws-bullet-buttons-california.htmlfor more details.
 
Not sure how this state became became the think-tank for idiotic laws and taxes and fees and regulations. Here is what I got in my email in-box this morning:

"This information was provided by NRA-ILA

Recess is over for members of the California Legislature and they already have plenty of anti-gun bills scheduled to be heard as early as TODAY.

As usual, the California Legislature is working hard to rid the Golden State of ALL firearms and law-abiding gun owners and sportsmen. Several anti-gun and anti-hunting bills have passed their house of origin, which means law-abiding gun owners and sportsmen MUST work hard to STOP these bills from final passage.

It is IMPERATIVE that you, your family, friends and fellow gun owners and sportsmen call AND e-mail your state Legislators TODAY and respectfully urge them to support their law-abiding constituents who own firearms. Let them know that law-abiding citizens are the only ones who are affected by any and all firearm laws. Enacting more restrictive firearm laws is not stopping criminals.

With the 2012 legislative session expected to end at the end August, these bills will move fast and gun owners and sportsmen need to be ready.

In the Assembly Appropriations Committee: Please contact members of the Assembly Appropriations Committee and urge them to OPPOSE SB 249, SB 1221 and SB 1366. Contact information for members of this committee can be found here.


Senate Bill 249 – Semi-Automatic Component Ban – EXPECTED TO BE HEARD NEXT WEEK.

SB 249, as amended, would make a small but profound change to the definition of what constitutes a detachable magazine for a semiautomatic firearm. By doing so, hundreds of thousands of semi-automatic rifles, which were legally sold in California over the last decade, would become illegal on July 1, 2013. SB 249 also has no provisions to allow permitting, licensing or reimbursement for the loss of valuable property. Worse yet, the bill doesn’t require a public notice program to advise owners of this change in state law. Thousands of owners could be arrested for inadvertent violations. If you own an affected firearm, your only choices would be to destroy it, surrender it to a law enforcement agency, sell it out of state or have it confiscated at the time of your arrest! SB 249 is a pure anti-gun bill and MUST BE DEFEATED.


Senate Bill 1221 – Hunting Ban – EXPECTED TO BE HEARD THIS WEDNESDAY.

SB 1221, introduced by state Senator Ted Lieu (D-28), would ban hunting bears and bobcats with dogs. Hunting with dogs is a tradition that continues to be practiced across the country. Many dog breeds with select characteristics for hunting can be traced back for thousands of years. Seventeen states allow bear hunting with dogs. The use of hounds for hunting has never been shown to have an adverse impact on wildlife numbers. Biologists and other wildlife experts determine regulations and bag limits, just as they do with other hunting seasons.


Senate Bill 1366 – Lost and Stolen Reporting of Firearms


– EXPECTED TO BE HEARD THIS WEDNESDAY.

SB 1366, introduced by state Senator Mark DeSaulnier (D-7), would require every person to report the theft or loss of a firearm he or she owns or possesses to a local law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction in which the theft or loss occurred within 48 hours of the time he or she knew or reasonably should have known that the firearm had been stolen or lost. Law-abiding gun owners should not be made a victim twice.


In the state Senate Appropriations Committee: Please contact members of the Senate Appropriations Committee and urge them to OPPOSE AB 1527, AB 2333 and AB 2460. Contact information for members of this committee can be found here.


Assembly Bill 1527 – Open Carry Ban (of unloaded long gun)

– EXPECTED TO BE HEARD TODAY.

AB 1527, introduced by Assemblyman Anthony Portantino (D-44), would expand on last year’s ban on open carrying of an unloaded handgun to also include unloaded rifles and shotguns.


Assembly Bill 2460 – Ban of Law Enforcement Transfer of Firearms

– EXPECTED TO BE HEARD TODAY.

AB 2460, introduced by Assemblyman Roger Dickinson (D-9), would ban law enforcement officers from transferring handguns that are not on California’s approved “roster” to anyone but law enforcement officers. Currently, California law allows for the transfer of firearms that are not on the approved "roster" to be transferred to law-abiding civilians. These transfers must go through a licensed firearms dealer and are only transferred when the new civilian owner has passed a criminal background check.


On the Assembly floor: Please contact your Assemblyman and urge him or her to OPPOSE SB 1315. Contact information can be found here.


Senate Bill 1315 – Local Regulation of Firearms – EXPECTED TO BE HEARD TODAY.


SB 1315, introduced by anti-gun extremist state Senator Kevin de León (D-22), is just a stepping stone to completely destroying California’s firearms preemption law. Firearms preemption laws are in place to standardize firearm laws across the state. This critical law keeps law-abiding gun owners from being placed in jeopardy of running afoul of local restrictions they don`t even know exist simply because they have crossed from one municipality to another. SB 1315 would authorize Los Angeles County to enact and enforce an ordinance or resolution that is stricter than state law regarding the manufacture, sale, possession or use of any BB device, toy gun, replica of a firearm, or other device that is so substantially similar in coloration and overall appearance to an existing firearm as to lead a reasonable person to perceive that the device is a firearm and that expels a projectile that is no more than 16 millimeters in diameter."
 
I've been in Texas for 20 years and really like it here. I'm going to stay right here.

I've visited California but never lived there. I was born and lived for a long time in Illinois which is just about as bad as California about gun regulations. When I see garbage like these California regulations, I like Texas even more!

May God bless Texas and the United States of America! Some places in the US are still free!

Flash
 
Back
Top