New PCC 124gr 1345FPS. Sweden ammo cheaper than any US option if interested

W

wild cat mccane

New member
Really fast in 124gr too. Thinking of the 1300fps Federal Classic in 115gr.

This probably not for MY handguns, but maybe somebody is interesting in theirs...using FMJ :D
 
There is no perfect measure to decreasing pressure/FPS based on backing down a barrel length vs advertised speed, is there? I imagine this is still hottish though as it seems 9mm does top out after a quick point.

You're right to point this out. The handgun label is also telling where not looking at a 357 load either :D

It is 100lbs heaver than the Federal PCC load which is likely out of a PCC barrel length too?
 
That speed is from a 17" barrel. It is, after all, intended for a PCC.

It clocked at just a little over 1,100 fps from my 5" pistol barrel.
 
Right this is PCC ammo, sorry. The velocity for the regular ammo is from a 6” barrel.

https://www.glocktalk.com/threads/norma-115gr-9mm-fmj-and-strange-advertised-test-velocity.1886216/

Edit: although Norma's website says the data here is “zeroed with a 6" barrel”. If they use the same barrel length for zeroing as they do for velocity measures then maybe it is a 6” barrel.

https://www.norma-ammunition.com/en...envy/norma-9-mm-luger-envy-124-gr---299440050



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Interesting. Just for comparison, Winchester Q4318 124 NATO ball averages 1319 FPS in my 16" carbine. The IMI 124 NATO averages 1349 FPS in the same 16" barrel.

The Norma load is sure not wimpy. About 25% faster than standard pressure Federal 124 grain ball, that averages 1071 FPS in the same 16" PCC. May have to look into some of that Norma ammo myself...
 
74A95 said:
No, that's not what it says. Read it again.
Click to expand...


I know it says “product day is zeroed with”. There are essentially two measurements on that page about the bullet once fired; velocity, which in turn is used to calculate energy along with the barrel weight, and “wind”, which appears to be deflection at distance. It doesn’t make sense to me that they would report wind deflection with a 6” barrel but report velocities from a 17” barrel. And it’s not that the 6” is just a placeholder that never changes, because it does change to 5” on other 9mm products on that website.

It sounds like you own this ammunition. Since Norma details on the box what barrel length was used for the velocity measure, why don’t you take a picture of where it says this was from a 17” barrel and post it for us?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
TunnelRat said:
I know it says “product day is zeroed with”. There are essentially two measurements on that page about the bullet once fired; velocity, which in turn is used to calculate energy along with the barrel weight, and “wind”, which appears to be deflection at distances. It doesn’t make sense to me that they would report wind deflection with a 6” barrel but report velocities from a 17” barrel. And it’s not that the 6” is just a placeholder that never changes, because it does change to 5” on other 9mm products on that website.
Click to expand...

So you decided to just make up the 'chronographed from a 6" barrel'? Brilliant.

TunnelRat said:
It sounds like you own this ammunition. Since Norma details on the box what barrel length was used for the velocity measure, why don’t you take a picture of that for us?
Click to expand...

I shot all of mine.

Ask Norma what barrel length they used for that ammo.

And here's another source of information: https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2019/11/6/review-norma-9mm-competition-ammunition/
Their 5" barrel speed is very close to what I got.
 
74A95 said:
So you decided to just make up the 'chronographed from a 6" barrel'? Brilliant.



I shot all of mine.

Ask Norma what barrel length they used for that ammo.

And here's another source of information: https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2019/11/6/review-norma-9mm-competition-ammunition/
Their 5" barrel speed is very close to what I got.
Click to expand...


I don’t consider reading “product data is zeroed with” and assuming it refers to all measurements on that page (as there is nothing that indicates otherwise) to be “making something up”, but if that’s how you want to read what I wrote by all means go ahead. Why on this particular thread I would decide to “make something up” about a manufacturer of ammunition I have no attachment to is beyond me, and then on top of that voluntarily explain how I got to that conclusion. What I’m trying to do is understand what is causing what I see as contradictory information.

Thank you for the link.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top