New Legal Community Against Violence Web Site

Drizzt

New member
Oh, you'll just love this one...... :barf:

New Legal Community Against Violence Web Site Helps Communities Regulate Guns

SAN FRANCISCO, July 2 -- The Firearms Law Center, a national project of Legal Community Against Violence, launched a new web site Monday designed to help communities across America develop their own gun regulations.

The interactive site, www.firearmslawcenter.org, offers a comprehensive state-by-state look at state and local gun laws, direct links to anti-violence groups in each state, and links to other groups with expertise in crafting gun legislation.

"President Bush has said there will be no new federal gun legislation during his term, but that doesn't have to be the final word on the subject," said Barrie Becker, executive director of Firearms Law Center and LCAV. "We've helped more than 100 cities and counties in California pass local ordinances that have helped reduce firearm-related injuries and deaths. We want to help other states do the same."

In addition to California, approximately 15 states have laws allowing cities and counties latitude in enacting gun regulations, including Colorado, Illinois and Ohio, states many experts, including Becker, see as pivotal venues ripe for assistance such as that offered by Firearms Law Center.

"Our site allows anyone to click on their state, find out what types of regulations are permitted, what kinds of regulations have already been passed statewide, and what they can do to enact ordinances to make their communities safer."

Some states and localities, for example, have passed gun laws requiring background checks at gun shows; mandating that all handguns be sold with state-of-the-art, child-proof locks; banning the sale of assault weapons (those manufactured prior to the federal manufacturing ban), and otherwise regulating guns and ammunition.

"By making information about local efforts to regulate guns more accessible, the Firearms Law Center helps communities close the loopholes in our nation's gun laws," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California.

The web site debuts on the anniversary of a horrific shooting in downtown San Francisco eight years ago that left nine people dead and five wounded. On July 1, 1993, a disgruntled former client walked into a high-rise office tower at 101 California St. and began spraying the offices of Pettit & Martin law firm (now defunct) with assault weapon fire. The gunman killed himself as police closed in on him in a stairwell.

For more information about Firearms Law Center and Legal Community Against Violence, contact Barrie Becker at 415-433-2062. Or visit www.firearmslawcenter.org.


http://interestalert.com/brand/site...ahl&Type=News&Fid=REPUBLIC&Filter=Republicans
 
I was sure that the offices of this bunch of shysters would be at 101 California Street but I was wrong. They are on Bush Street.

These guys are in this for the money and nothing more. They also know that Shakespeare was right -- and that we know it -- and they are very afraid.
 
To think I took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of American when the Chief Justice of Indiana swore me in back in `95. No doubt attorneys in the PRK take the oath to Das Kapital or the Manifesto.
 
"By making information about local efforts to regulate guns more accessible, the Firearms Law Center helps communities close the loopholes in our nation's gun laws," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That damn second amendment loophole!!!!
 
:barf:

Since the language I would like to use to describe that site is well bellow TFL standards, I choose to be mute on this issue, except for this:
:barf: :barf:
 
Thought I would update this thread, since the LCAV site has changed. Drizzt, are you still here?

http://www.lcav.org/

This is the proper link. Interesting, but I got the link throught packing.org and it does have nice compact lists of state laws, despite being obsessively and compulsively nuts otherwise. The state I was looking up, Mississippi, seems to have a lot of their agenda items unlisted. I suppose they would like the good people of that fair state to fill in all the blanks with a hi cap ban, trigger lock law, Class III ban, ugly gun ban, et cetera.

I will save the other editorial comments except one:

[rant]
I have an aquaintance who was raped by a lawyer. (Ok she was ALLEGEDLY raped.) She was only one of a dozen or so women who were (allegedly) raped by this same guy, who was never prosecuted. So where are the lawyer sites lobbying to have the whole bunch castrated?

The more I think about it, the more I think that lawyers should have to be fixed before they can get their license. Precident? Well, the Chinese actually came up with the idea, so that a guy couldn't work in politics or the law unless he was castrated and their civilization lasted nearly 6,000 years. Pretty good idea.
[/rant]
 
The more I think about it, the more I think that lawyers should have to be fixed before they can get their license.
Some of them apparently have been. (They just threw the wrong part away).

Hey...what's wrong with lawyer jokes???
Well, lawyers don't think they are funny, and no one else thinks that they are jokes.

Okay. I'll be good. Just couldn't help myself.
 
Not anymore...

In addition to California, approximately 15 states have laws allowing cities and counties latitude in enacting gun regulations, including Colorado, Illinois and Ohio, states many experts, including Becker, see as pivotal venues ripe for assistance such as that offered by Firearms Law Center.

Colorado has removed a lot of the leeway local communities had in terms of regulating firearms. For most people in Colorado, this has meant an increase in the freedom to carry firearms. For those living in mostly rural areas of Colorado, it has meant a decrease in such freedom.

-Morgan
 
Can those local regulations be viewed as unconstitutional laws because some firearms are manufactured out of state and subject to Federal firearms laws? Wouldn't the local laws be in effect regulating interstate commerce? If they are mandating smart gun technology, shell casing numbers, etc... from out of state manufacturers, isn't that one of the powers enumerated for the federal govt and not the state or city?
 
Back
Top