my turn to re-light the fires, I guess. speaking of LAVs, when I look at the LAV-25 and family, it sure looks "tippy" to me. not the sort of thing I'd want to give to a bunch of testosterone-laden 20 year olds in rough terrain. I'm going to guess there is some sort of width constraint that caused that design to be narrow and high. what trasport vehicle is the problem?
secondly, to be able to improve the tooth/tail ratio of our forces, what areas could we reduce the support train the most? vehicle maintenance? supply?
secondly, to be able to improve the tooth/tail ratio of our forces, what areas could we reduce the support train the most? vehicle maintenance? supply?