I attended a gun show south of Atlanta and was trying to sell or trade a few items and came across a few HK91 clones and need some opinions or suggestions from those that know more about these than I do.
I am still kicking myself in the rear for not getting a real HK91 back in the 80s when they could be had for $800 or less so these things looked attractive to me at right at about $525.
First was a CETME. The receiver says it's made by Century Arms which I've heard (only rumor) has real spotty quality. Pluses on this model were a steel receiver and what appeared to be better quality welds. Drawbacks are it comes with wood furniture that is not in the best condition, a strange looking "windmill" rear sight and no real provision to easily mount a scope.
Second was a FA G3. Receiver says it is made by Freedom Arms. I think I've heard of this company before but only in regards to big bore revolvers. Pluses were an integrated scope rail built onto the receiver, black synthetic furiture, a proper "castle" rear sight and overall better looking finish (didn't look painted on). Drawbacks were what appeared to be an aluminum receiver (much larger than the steel unit on the CETME) and poor quality welding.
What do you know about these two rifles? Is one significantly better than the other? Is there anything I should know before make a decision one way or the other? Is the $525 price about right?
Since I didn't pick one up today I have some time to think about it. I'd still like to get one of these but I may well decide to order what I've REALLY been lusting after for the past year and get a Robinson Arms M96 in the new RECON configuration instead.
Thanks for any help and information you can provide.
Joe
I am still kicking myself in the rear for not getting a real HK91 back in the 80s when they could be had for $800 or less so these things looked attractive to me at right at about $525.
First was a CETME. The receiver says it's made by Century Arms which I've heard (only rumor) has real spotty quality. Pluses on this model were a steel receiver and what appeared to be better quality welds. Drawbacks are it comes with wood furniture that is not in the best condition, a strange looking "windmill" rear sight and no real provision to easily mount a scope.
Second was a FA G3. Receiver says it is made by Freedom Arms. I think I've heard of this company before but only in regards to big bore revolvers. Pluses were an integrated scope rail built onto the receiver, black synthetic furiture, a proper "castle" rear sight and overall better looking finish (didn't look painted on). Drawbacks were what appeared to be an aluminum receiver (much larger than the steel unit on the CETME) and poor quality welding.
What do you know about these two rifles? Is one significantly better than the other? Is there anything I should know before make a decision one way or the other? Is the $525 price about right?
Since I didn't pick one up today I have some time to think about it. I'd still like to get one of these but I may well decide to order what I've REALLY been lusting after for the past year and get a Robinson Arms M96 in the new RECON configuration instead.
Thanks for any help and information you can provide.
Joe