National Review Pro-gun issue!

Brett Bellmore

New member
Check out the latest issue of National Review: www.nationalreview.com/contentspage/contents.html

41700.gif


It's kind of ironic; As NR's founder, Bill Buckley Jr., slowly drifts off into an anti-gun senility, the magazine finally begins to show some guts on the issue.

Darn, and I figured that the GOP's betrayal on this issue was gonna catapult the Libertarian party into the big time; Guess it's not going to happen!

------------------
Sic semper tyrannis!
 
Brett,

Where did you here that Bill Buckley Jr. was anti gun? When I used to watch "Firing Line", he always seemed proRKBA.

robert

------------------
"But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip; and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." -Jesus Christ (Luke 22:36, see John 3:15-18)
---------------------------
"Reasonable gun law?............There's No such critter!" --EQ

[This message has been edited by EQUALIZER (edited April 09, 2000).]
 
I do recall in one of Buckley's sections ('On the Right') in '91 or '92, Buckley wanted the Brady Bill passed. This was before the '93 version was passed, with its sunset and replacement of the waiting period with the NICS check provisions. His argument stemmed on the need for the 'cool down' period to stop heat of the moment gun purchases and subsequent homicides and suicides.
I also recall one of David Kopel's issue papers on the 'Shall Issue' carry permits of the early 90's referred to Buckley as being a proponent of gun control, yet he enjoyed the benefits of a CCW in NYC because of his wealth and status. Kind of ironic because I know that at least one article of Kopel's has appeared in National Review.
As a snub to gun owners, National Review printed an inflammatory cover cartoon in '93 or '94 titled 'back to school issue', which shows a small child (with a slingshot in his back pocket) picking out a micro uzi from a wall display of what have been titled 'assault weapons' (Kalashnikov, AR15, SPAS 12 M1928 Thompson, and various autoloading pistols) while the surprised/ stumped proprieter/clerk is assisting the child. I thought that this was a smear on FFL dealers (specifically gun shop owners) since it presented a store environment that the two were in, and made it appear as if the proprieter had no means to prevent the child from examining or buying the firearm. I don't know what was going on in the heads of the editors or art staff at the time, considering that this cover would have been more likely on 'Mother Jones', 'The New Republic', or 'Rolling Stone' than a publication of the right side of the American political spectrum. If it was humor, it is a strange one that is in poor taste and misleading.
Aha! The issue with this cover on it is September 12, 1994. vol. XLVI, no. 17. The special section has the feature "School Wars", which have no articles on violence/guns in the schools, but articles on OBE (Outcome Based Education), school choice, mainstreaming, and other items. The cover is neither relevent to the contents or the truth (gun stores allowing minors in or letting them examine firearms?)
 
Equalizer: Well, Buckley has never been what you'd call hard core pro-gun, but recently he's been, well, suffering from old-timers disease. Been running anti-gun columns from time to time, and even described Brian Puckett's organization as a gun control organization dedicated to repealing the Second amendment! It's sad; One of the highest moments of my youth was seeing Buckley fall backwards out of his chair when he brought Firing Line to Tech. But we all go that way if we live long enough.

------------------
Sic semper tyrannis!
 
Back
Top