Nat Hentoff - Teacher brings Constitution to life

ESSAY

Nat Hentoff

Teacher brings Constitution to life
http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- IN 40 YEARS of traveling around the country, speaking at high schools and middle schools on the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution, I have found only a few teachers who can bring the words off the page and into the lives of their students.

One of the most passionately knowledgeable of those teachers is Sherry Hearn. Voted Teacher of the Year at Windsor Forest High School in Savannah, Ga., she has taught social studies and constitutional law there for 27 years.

As at many schools in the nation, Windsor Forest students are occasionally subject without warning to dragnet raids by the police, who herd the students into the hallways and use dogs to sniff the students, their purses and their book bags. Metal detectors are used to scan students' bodies. The students are locked into the building for two to three hours while the police perform the search.

Contrary to the specific words of the Fourth Amendment to the Bill of Rights, the searches are conducted without any particular information that any student has used or is using drugs. All of them are presumed guilty of possessing drugs or weapons unless a police dog or metal detector exonerates them.

Sherry Hearn taught her students for years about how the Fourth amendment came into being because of the privacy abuses suffered by American colonists due to the sweeping searches and seizures performed by British troops. During one of these police sweeps on her school, a student asked her why she was so angry at the raid.

"Because I believe in the Constitution," she said.

A policeman overheard her, reported her to the principal and said she should be watched during the next lockdown. At the next dragnet search, the police also searched the teachers' cars in the parking lot in violation of a school policy that teachers' cars could not be searched without the consent of their owners. Hearn was not asked for her consent.

A police dog found that morning half of a hand-rolled marijuana cigarette in an ashtray in her car. It was still warm. Sherry Hearn had been in the school the entire morning. That night, a caller on the county's Silent Witness line said that the cigarette had been planted in the car. He did not give his identity. The cigarette was never produced as evidence because, a police officer said, it had "crumbled" during the search and no residue was kept.

According to school policy, Hearn was told she had to take a drug test within two hours of being informed that an illegal substance had been found in her car. She had no record at all of previous drug use, and the principal, Linda Herman, later testified that the teacher had not exhibited on the day of the search, or on any other day, the characteristic behavior that would have given rise to a "reasonable suspicion" that the marijuana cigarette was hers.

On that day, however, Hearn was given her Miranda warnings and was ordered to take a urine test in two hours. She wanted to contact her lawyer before taking the test, but he was unavailable that day. Not having legal advice, she refused. She also said, "How can I face my students after I've consistently told them that these mass drug searches violate their constitutional rights?"

The next day, having spoken to her attorney, she underwent a urinalysis, and it proved negative for marijuana or any other controlled substance.

(The active ingredients in marijuana can be found in the body of a casual user for up to 30 days, and up to a year in the body of a chronic user.)

No criminal charges were ever filed against Sherry Hearn, but she was fired in the spring of 1996 for not having taken the urine test within the two hours set forth in the school's policy. She has had great difficulty getting a teaching job since losing her job, and has lost her appeals to the Georgia State Board of Education and in the lower federal courts.

Sherry Hearn's last chance to get back to teaching constitutional law to students rests with the United States Supreme Court. As the Atlanta Constitution has said about her case, "This is not about drugs. This is about the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution."

Her attorneys, including a lawyer for the Rutherford Institute, are asking the Supreme Court to decide whether "public school students and teachers have the right to be free from suspicionless mass drug searches on campus" and whether "Hearn should have been ordered to take a drug test based on alleged contraband that was illegally seized."

It's up to the Supreme Court to tell Sherry Hearn's students -- and other young Americans throughout the land -- whether she was right in advising students "Never, ever give up your rights that people have paid for in blood just because it's the easy thing to do."


JWR contributor Nat Hentoff is a First Amendment authority and author of numerous books.

------------------
Slowpoke Rodrigo...he pack a gon...

Vote for the Neal Knox 13
 
Weed out and destroy the seditious radicals in our schools! Save the children from radicalism!

Absolutely disgusting!

------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes" RKBA!
 
There is precious little sand left in the top of the hour glass.

------------------
Sam I am, grn egs n packin

Nikita Khrushchev!." We cannot expect the Americans to jump from capitalism to communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans small doses of socialism, until they suddenly awake to find they have communism."
 
Radical she may be, but she was right. Please extrapolate this to the second amendment (specifically violating the fourth to violate the second) and change your tune accordingly.
 
Shipley..

Are you capable of comprehending the concept of facetious?



------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes" RKBA!
 
Just hope that's never me.

They whine and bitch and moan constantly that they can't get the best people to be teachers. Well, DUH. For the most part, the best people aren't willing to work for a committee of people who don't know much about their jobs, or to accept way less pay than they believe they deserve, or to buy their own tools and materials out of that meager paycheck, or live with the fact that normal civil rights often aren't considered to apply to them, or be told that the usefulness of the tools they use in the classroom is irrelevant if they're "deemed unsuitable," or any of a bunch of other crappy things, just for the privilege of teaching kids. So they end up with dregs like me.
:rolleyes:
 
RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH

VIRGINIA/METRO RICHMOND
Henrico teacher may lose job / Spoke to students, ACLU about random search

Friday, April 28, 2000

BY RHEA R. BORJA
Times-Dispatch Staff Writer


When Henrico County teacher Liz Armstrong chatted briefly with her students about their rights, little did she know that those discussions might threaten to end her career as an educator.

It wasn't just those five-minute chats that may cost the Highland Springs High School science teacher her job. Combined with a series of events, including a random search of her students by school administrators and her subsequent call to the American Civil Liberties Union, the discussions led school officials to call for her dismissal.

They say she violated these teacher responsibilities: effective use of instructional time, responsiveness to supervision, compliance with school and school division policies and use of good judgment.

Yesterday, Armstrong appealed the superintendent's decision in a hearing before


the Henrico School Board, which has final say. The board has 30 days to decide.

At the hearing, Armstrong said she talked to the students about the search because they were upset.

"It was necessary to talk about their feelings," she said. "How else would one turn a volatile situation into a search for answers?"

Armstrong, who has been on paid leave since March 27, has taught in Henrico for nine years, the past four at Highland Springs. She said she is being punished for exercising her constitutional right to free speech and seeking the truth about the county's policy on student searches. She also said she's being punished to set an example for other teachers not to question school officials.

It all started Feb. 23. That morning, Highland Springs Principal William R. Hite and four other school administrators and the school's campus security officer searched the classes on the second floor. They walked into Armstrong's biology class and told students to empty their pockets and place their backpacks and purses on their desks and open them.

Hite and the others waved metal-detector wands over the students and inspected the bags by hand. They found and confiscated one pager.

Many of Armstrong's students objected to the search, stating that it was illegal. Some said they wanted to sue.

"The kids were furious. Most of them were shaken up," Armstrong said. "They felt that some students had been searched harder than others."

Armstrong herself was upset. She said the search was not done by the book. According to county regulations, an official is to wave a metal detector over a bag before personal inspection and examine the bag if the metal detector goes off.

Later that day, Armstrong called the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia for information about the search's legality.

Kent Willis, executive director of the state's ACLU, said the search was illegal and offered to help. He cited the State Board of Education's guidelines, which he said don't allow suspicionless searches of students and their property.

Armstrong declined his offer, saying that she only wanted to "get the facts."

She talked to Hite the next day and wrote him a letter suggesting guidelines for random searches.

"What I witnessed yesterday had far less to do with maintaining a safe learning environment than it did with intimidation and humiliation," she said in the letter.

Hite said he was upset because of the letter and the fact that Armstrong went to an outside group before talking to him. Other school officials felt the same way.

"I was shocked by [the letter's] tone. Random searches are a deterrent," Susan McNamee, an assistant principal and one of the officials who conducted the search, said at yesterday's hearing. "I felt the accusations make our team look bad."

They also were upset that Armstrong sometimes devoted about five minutes of class time to talk about issues not connected to the class subject.

"She's a science teacher," said Lyle Evans, assistant superintendent for administrative services.

School administrators became more upset three weeks later when a student asked Hite whether searches were illegal. Hite said no and asked the student where he got that information. The student replied that Armstrong told him.

Hite said he "felt Mrs. Armstrong was inciting students."

At yesterday's hearing, Superintendent Mark A. Edwards said the searches were legal. He quoted the county's student "Code of Conduct," which states that students and their property may be searched. He and other school officials also said Armstrong shouldn't have talked to students without talking to them first.

Rebecca K. Glenberg, legal director of the Virginia ACLU, said firing Armstrong for talking to the ACLU and her class would violate her First Amendment right to free speech. In an April 18 letter to the School Board, she referred to a Supreme Court case stating that public employees have the right to speak out on matters of public concern.

Several board members, however, echoed school officials' concerns.

Board member Stuart P. Myers asked Armstrong, "Would you do anything differently now if you could do it over again?"

Armstrong replied, "Yes, I would have gone to Mr. Hite first. But I would have gotten the same response."

Several of Armstrong's former students attended the hearing to support her. One of them, Ian Matthews, said Armstrong was one of the few teachers who took time to help him.

"Most of the [others], they don't care," he said.

His mother, Linda Matthews, a former police officer, said Armstrong was only trying to help students by answering their questions and talking to them.

"Sometimes you have to go out of the box. Maybe she woke up the potential and inner ambitions of students for the law, or to become a forensic scientist. If students knew both sides of the law, they'd have more respect for it. Asking why is always good."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Call Rhea R. Borja at (804) 649-6671 or e-mail her at rborja@timesdispatch.com





------------------
Slowpoke Rodrigo...he pack a gon...

I voted for the Neal Knox 13

I'll see you at the TFL End Of Summer Meet!
 
STORY

May 15, 2000 - 10:39 AM


Court Rejects Appeal of Teacher Fired for Refusing Drug Test
By Laurie Asseo
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - A former Georgia high school teacher fired for refusing to take a drug test after police using a drug-sniffing dog found marijuana in her car lost a Supreme Court appeal today.
The court, without comment, turned away the teacher's argument that the search was unlawful because it was not based on individual suspicion and because officers did not get a warrant before going inside her car.

Sherry Hearn, a social studies teacher at Windsor Forest High School in Savannah, sued the Chatham County school board after her 1996 firing.

In April of that year, the school's campus police officers conducted a random search for drugs, assisted by dog handlers from the county sheriff's department. The officers used the dogs to search classrooms and examine cars in the school's parking lot.

A dog indicated it smelled drugs in Hearn's car, which had an open window. Police said they entered the car and found a marijuana cigarette in the ashtray.

The teacher said police did not produce the marijuana cigarette and she was not charged with a crime. She contends authorities later received a call saying a student admitted planting the drugs.

Hearn was ordered to take a drug test under the school's anti-drug policy. She refused, although she said she passed a test at a commercial lab the next day.

Hearn was fired, and the state Board of Education upheld the firing.

She sued, saying the search of her car was illegal and that she could not be fired as the result of an unlawful search. Drug-sniffing dogs cannot be used in public school parking lots without individual suspicion, and the police should not have entered her car without a warrant, the lawsuit said.

A federal judge and the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against her.

In the appeal acted on today, Hearn's lawyers said public employees cannot be fired for refusing to take a drug test when the suspicion of drug use was based on unlawfully seized evidence.

The school district's lawyers said dogs can be used to sniff cars without violating the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which bans unreasonable searches. They also said a drug dog alert creates enough suspicion to allow police to enter a car.

The case is Hearn vs. Savannah Board of Education, 99-1477.

---

On the Net: For the appeals court ruling: http://www.uscourts.gov./links.html and click on 11th Circuit.
 
Back
Top