I have met with a few rifle makers in the last few weeks and the question came up in my mind, when can/should a firearm (rifle) be named after the person/company who made it?
My reasoning for this question is that some of the rifle makers that I met with will buy the action and trigger already made, buy a barrel that has been threaded and contoured, then screw them all together and attach them to a stock then slap their name the barrel. It seems the only amount of actual work they put into it is glass bedding and drilling out for scope rings.
So, if someone buys a barrel blank from somewhere like Wilson Arms (threading, reaming, crowning, contour done by the maker), then buys a pre-built action/trigger and spends time hand crafting a stock, then bedding. Would this example carry naming rights from the maker? Or would/should it be named after the barrel make or other component?
Can anyone shed some light on this?
My reasoning for this question is that some of the rifle makers that I met with will buy the action and trigger already made, buy a barrel that has been threaded and contoured, then screw them all together and attach them to a stock then slap their name the barrel. It seems the only amount of actual work they put into it is glass bedding and drilling out for scope rings.
So, if someone buys a barrel blank from somewhere like Wilson Arms (threading, reaming, crowning, contour done by the maker), then buys a pre-built action/trigger and spends time hand crafting a stock, then bedding. Would this example carry naming rights from the maker? Or would/should it be named after the barrel make or other component?
Can anyone shed some light on this?