My Letter to my Congressperson - A typical response.

Elker_43

New member
I just wanted to post a recent letter that I have received from my very liberal California Congressperson (Lois Capps - California)

I have also posted my response to this letter which I sent today.
Both are pretty short.
---------------------

Dear Sir,

Thank you for contacting my office to express your opposition to gun control. I appreciate hearing from you concerning this important matter.

As you know, in the last year there have been numerous incidents of gun violence in our schools. In Oregon, Arkansas, and Michigan, children have needlessly lost their lives. While there is no simple solution to this crisis, I believe that we must do more to keep guns out of the hands of children. In my view, guns are simply too easily obtained by young people who use them to hurt themselves or others.

I support the rights of hunters and sportsmen to obtain and use firearms for legal purposes. I do not believe that the passage of common sense gun legislation will infringe upon these rights. Instead, enacting bipartisan gun safety bills will help keep guns out of the hands of children and criminals.

Again, Thank you for contacting my office. Please keep in touch.
Sincerely,
Lois Capps - Member of Congress
---------------------------
Here is my response:

Dear Representative Capps,

Thank you for your recent letter responding to my previous three letters. Although the three letters concerned military spending questions in addition to gun control issue questions, I understand that your staff probably reads and answers these letters only, as you may not have the time to read and understand our many concerns.

Your recent letter still gives me great concern when you have defined your aspect of gun control issues. You indicated, and I quote, "I support the rights of hunters and sportsmen to obtain and use firearms for legal purposes. I do not believe that the passage of common sense gun legislation will infringe upon these rights." Is this the only group or right to keep and bear arms that you support? There are tens of millions of us in this country who legally obtain and use firearms as a matter of our Constitutional rights, for self-protection, or for collecting as a hobby. In the larger sense of this subject, I believe that this Country, the Constitution and my inalienable rights come first even before hunting and sports. I do hope that you can agree on this and when speaking of supporting the legal use of firearms in the future that you include the above.

Please let me know how you feel on this extended subject. I thank you in advance for your time and thoughts.

The above is a perfect example of the Liberal element in Washington and their total disregard of their Constitutional Oath of office and their total ignorance of the 2nd Amendment.

------------------
To own firearms is to affirm that freedom and liberty are not gifts from the state.
 
Note how she used the same catch-phrases. "Common-sense" gun laws. "Gun Safety" laws. "Hunters and sportsmen." "Keep guns out of the hands of children and criminals."

You see these words, some of them newly used, at all levels. Federal, state, city, HCI, media.

Did these folks go to the same seminar last summer where the handed out the poll-tested catch-phrases?

Rick
 
Lois Capps is a congenital moron, and an absolute joke in her district to anyone with a modicum of intelligence.
She has 2 catch phrases that she uses every time she speaks to the public or TV camera....and she is known by them
1) "I'm working very hard" (or "I have worked very hard")
2) "I am a school nurse"...this is used to explain her self-appointed omniscience that gives her expertise in everything from childcare, school vouchers, off-shore oil drilling, the Hubble Telescope and anything else she may think of.
The woman is an utter embarrassment and a laughingstock.

------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes" RKBA!
 
DC, re: the "school nurse" comment; on the old Prodigy BB's, I had the misfortune to encounter a poster by the name of BKE who was a pediatrician, and used his medical credentials to try and beat into submission anyone who disagreed with him. This man had never handled a firearm in his life, and tried to argue with me that handguns are easier for an assailant to take away than long guns. ("Nobody needs a handgun for defense!")
It's amazing what a little education does to people when it's not linked with any common sense or ability to think without being told what to think. Save us all from "educated idiots."

------------------
Shoot straight regards, Richard at The Shottist's Center
 
If the lady is as bad as described in several posts, what does that say for the people of that district, especially if she is not a first termer?
 
She "inherited" her position from her husband, originally. Walter Capps (UCSB theology prof) was elected and served almost one year, he then had a heart attack and died in Dec '97. Lois was appointed to serve for 3 months until a special election could be held. 2 Republicans ran against her and it was a fiasco...both these guys had experience but they ended up running against each other and forgot about Lois. Firestone had been a Santa Barbara supervisor, he is a wealthy business man (owner of Firestone Winery) and he is a moderate. Tom Bordonaro had been a state assemblyman, he is from my area and is quite conservative.
The major problem was that the "Right to Lifers" hijacked Bordonaro and made abortion a key (almost the only) issue; and the fight between Bornonaro and Firestone became very ugly. Lois stayed low key, played the grieving wife to a tee and ran primarily on fulfilling her dead husband's dream. She won.

Fast forward to Nov' 98 ...New election for a full term. Its Bordonaro vs Capps.....Tom was still tainted by the last election's ugliness of a few months back; Lois had ducked everything controversial. Though she had accomplished squat, she ran primarily on education and senior health issues (these were not her dead hubby's hot buttons). Though it was very close, Lois won.
She won because she is a liberal and a "tragic" figure....one of her daughters (a UC prof) developed uterine cancer and it was public. So there was the recent widow dealing with a dying daughter...dovetailed nicely with her campaign issues.
To understand this district...look at a map of Calif....district encompasses Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties. The Liberals are concentrated in SB and along the US 101 corridor...Conservatives are primarily off the corridor and in the north SLO county. I do believe she may lose this time...she has had 3 years and has failed abysmally on her own issues: senior health care is a primary one...and every single HMO has pulled out of North SLO county on her watch.
Lois is a horrible public speaker, is definately over her head, truly has accomplished very little if anything, but has the sympathy thing going for her.
This next election will be different...she is running against Mike Stoker...he has experience, is well-known and though conservative, he is liked by many people.
I don't know about Santa Barbara, but even SLO liberals are beginning to grouse about Lois....its rather funny, everyone knows her catch phrase "Well I am a school nurse..." and laughs about it. Both Conservatives and Liberals use it when talking about her, and both use it in a derisive fashion.

------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes" RKBA!
 
DC,
Great recap of a most frustrating three and one half years. A very good compilation of the facts.

I am dedicated to Mike Stokers run for office. I plan on walking the SLO area for Mike. You will also see Mike's sign (4'x8') in the coming months at the 101 South, Hwy #1 off-ramp in SLO on my property.

Thanks again DC.


------------------
To own firearms is to affirm that freedom and liberty are not gifts from the state.
 
Back
Top