MS data

[zentao]

Firearms Tactical Institiute (www.firearmstactical.com) posted data today which show some significant discrepancies in Marshall-Sanow data base. Any comments on it?

Zentao

 

[BrokenArrow]

They have proof of mistakes, not fraud.

They have proof that M&S are sloppy mathematicians, proofreaders, and may have sloppy editors too.

They do not have proof they lied.

Reasonable doubt?

It does not fit, I must acquit.

OTOH, if they gave their work to others for peer review, this kind of stuff gets shaken out early. Why it's a good idea?

------------------
>>>>---->

 

[ChuteTheMall]

If anyone has a few hundred goats to spare we could attempt to replicate the Strasbourg tests, which may or may not have occurred.