A number of people who no longer hunt, due to age, location, or time constraints, still consider themselves hunters. There are also gun owners who have only hunting type arms, practice to hunt, but never have. They also consider themselves hunters.
That's akin to asking everyone who owns a handgun if they shoot it every year. There's probably a larger number of gun owners who bought one, shot it a few times, stuck it in a drawer years ago, and haven't fired it since, than there is the people like on this forum. Does that mean that they aren't truly "handgunners"?
Heck, you can say the same thing about people who own "black rifles".
Trying to assign people catagories, and then to assign them traits according to those catagories, is a VPC/Brady Bunch tactic.
Seems alot of the hunters (like Zumbo) think it does.
How about a little proof of that statement? I read most of the hunting magazines during the month, and haven't seen that particular comment, or even that train of thought. Maybe I've missed it, so show me.
To be quite frank, it sounds like somebody cleaned up a rant from the arfers, and found that little pearl in the back-flush.