I'm a big fan of the Flite Control loads from Federal. Truly amazing patterns from SD type guns.
I agree.
They discontinued the low recoil OO civillian load, but still list it as LEO only.
This is news to me. Is this a recent development?
This confused me as almost every reseller I shop at (whether brick and mortar store or online store) carries the standard (or "civilian" as you call it) low recoil 00 Buck variant. The "Federal Premium Home" website also continues to list the Low Recoil 00 Buck as an option. In addition (and on occassion), you can also find the "LE" version being sold at AmmunitionToGo.com.
If nothing else, I hear Hornady offers a solid Low Recoil round as well (the TAP series I think...not sure).
After reading all of those penetration test articles, I am a bit hesitant in using a shotgun as home defense...especially since I have 3 other family members in the house.
I hear an awful lot about this stuff and IMHO, almost any effective round can prove quite penentrative. Sure, some penetrate more than others and its not bad to err on the side of caution. But, you also dont want to end up on the side of the fence where "ineffectiveness" may reside. Either way, I guess based on general consensus that #1 or #4 Buckshot are good, less penetrative rounds should you decide to stay with in the Buckshot family. Then there are the proponents of various Birdshot loads. Then, there are folks like me who prefer the Low recoil 00 Buck loads (coming in at around 1140 fps..give or take).
Its ironic that you voice hesitancy about using a shotgun for HD vs. say, a handgun. I say this because I know of several individuals who have chosen to use a shotgun for HD exclusively due to their concerns about various handgun loads being far too penetrative. So it goes...
In either case, I honestly believe the best precaution against "overpenetration" is practice, familiarity (with the weapon used, the ammo contained within and your surroundings) and avoiding "wild" or "blind" shots at all costs. Also, closely tied to my previous statement, Im of the mind that unless an assailant (or probable assailant) is within plain sight, completely identifiable and within plausible range, there is absolutely no reason a weapon should be fired.
Any bullet/round, regardless of caliber, can result in disaster if the weapon firing it is not wielded in a responsible manner. To put it another way; no round, no matter how "safe," will make up for carelessness.