So I have been contemplating my next pistol purchase. Currently I own:
.45ACP HK USP45f (home defense, jeeping gun)
.38sp S&W 342ti (backpacking gun)
.380 Sig P230 stainless (wife's gun)
.357 Ruger Blackhawk (POS with pitted finish)
.22/.22mag Ruger single six (POS, pitted finish)
I am wanting to add another high quality auto to my stable. I am interested in a compact in either .45 or 9mm. This is where my question comes in:
In the occasion of a calamatous event (flood, fire, earthquake, war, insurrection), do you think it is a better philosophical idea to have multiple pistols in the same caliber for nice cross-platformability (the .45) or more availible calibers so as to better utilize whatever ammunition supply you come across?
Take your time.
Yes, I am serious!
J.T.
PS.. I dont have a firm opinion right now, otherwise I would probably already have bought my gun!
.45ACP HK USP45f (home defense, jeeping gun)
.38sp S&W 342ti (backpacking gun)
.380 Sig P230 stainless (wife's gun)
.357 Ruger Blackhawk (POS with pitted finish)
.22/.22mag Ruger single six (POS, pitted finish)
I am wanting to add another high quality auto to my stable. I am interested in a compact in either .45 or 9mm. This is where my question comes in:
In the occasion of a calamatous event (flood, fire, earthquake, war, insurrection), do you think it is a better philosophical idea to have multiple pistols in the same caliber for nice cross-platformability (the .45) or more availible calibers so as to better utilize whatever ammunition supply you come across?
Take your time.
Yes, I am serious!
J.T.
PS.. I dont have a firm opinion right now, otherwise I would probably already have bought my gun!