More looting of the public purse?

LAK

Moderator
Well, it could be connected to something else, but;

"Director Kuckuck, the University of California and the laboratory believe that any form of physical violence toward an individual is unacceptable.

is a very odd thing to include in a statement by an institution concerning a "random beating" ......

Los Alamos Whistleblower Severely Beaten
NewsMax.com
Tuesday, June 7, 2005

A Los Alamos National Laboratory whistleblower who has uncovered irregularities involving millions of dollars of taxpayer money at the government-backed facility was brutally beaten this past weekend.
According to several news reports, auditor Tommy Hook was violently attacked by three or four anonymous assailants, who allegedly ordered him to keep quiet.

Hook was scheduled to testify before Congress later this month, but is now in the hospital.

On Saturday night, Hook went to a Santa Fe bar, ostensibly to meet a person claiming to be a fellow Los Alamos whistleblower, who called that night.

Hook's wife, Susan, said her husband did not frequent bars.

When the person did not show up, Hook left the bar after consuming two drinks.

In the parking lot, he was yanked out of his car and beaten so badly by three or four men that he had to be taken to intensive care at a local emergency room.

Reportedly, Hook did not provoke these men. The men concentrated on kicking his head, and Hook's family feels that the men would have killed him if a club employee hadn't run from the club and stopped the beating.

Congressional staff members were set to arrive Tuesday in Los Alamos to investigate Hook's allegations of malfeasance at the lab.

Hook and another whistleblower sued the University of California, which manages Los Alamos, in March, alleging that after they uncovered management failures, university and lab managers tried to make their jobs miserable so they would quit.

Tommy Hook remains hospitalized with severe trauma to his face and head, including a fractured jaw, and a herniated disk.

The FBI has been called in to investigate the attack, and Hook is currently under close protective custody.


Congress Warned of Ill Treatment of Hook

Last March, Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project On Government Oversight (POGO), testified before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations regarding a review of security initiatives at DOE nuclear weapons facilities.

She especially focused on Hook and another whisterblower:

"I would be remiss if I did not report to the Committee that, while not a part of former Secretary Abraham's initiatives, the treatment of whistleblowers throughout the complex remains abysmal. Retaliation remains the norm, not the exception, as can be seen in the case of Tommy Hook and Chuck Montano, who have both worked at Los Alamos for decades.

"After the Committee's three hearings on financial fraud at Los Alamos, the University of California was telling the public that all was resolved, while at the same time retaliating against these two men who knew otherwise. Hook and Montano were responsible for providing audit support for UC and uncovered ongoing irregularities and outright misconduct amounting to millions of taxpayer dollars.

"Their audit reports were withheld from DOE. Their treatment? Their work was taken away from them, they were given no work for nine months, and now they are only being handed menial assignments. Even the head of the Los Alamos Site Office tried to intervene on Tommy Hook's behalf, only to be rebuffed by an arrogant University of California."

According to a report in GovExec.com, Susan Hook, the victim's wife, Bob Rothstein, his attorney, and Montano confirmed that Hook was at the club to meet with another employee who claimed to have information that would support charges of wrongdoing.

Susan Hook and Montano further alleged that the assault was absolutely connected to Tommy Hook's impending testimony:

"When they were beating him up, they were telling him ... 'If you know what is good for you, you will keep your mouth shut,'" said Susan Hook.

Rothstein recalled that a person claiming to be an auditor from Los Alamos had contacted Hook a week before and had offered to share information about financial issues at the laboratory.

Rothstein said that one meeting had already fallen through, but the second was arranged for Saturday night at the strip club.

The nightclub's doorman ran into the parking lot and broke up the attack, according to a club employee who witnessed the beating. The employee said Hook was assaulted by a group of men.

Joint Investigation

Called to the scene, FBI Special Agent Bill Elwell confirmed that federal agents are investigating with Santa Fe police officers.

He said they are "still trying to figure out" what happened at the nightclub. "We are looking into the allegations made by Mr. Hook," Elwell said.

Los Alamos issued a statement:

"The University of California and the laboratory are outraged that a laboratory employee was the victim of a weekend assault in Santa Fe. Director [Robert] Kuckuck was made aware of the attack this morning and expressed his hope that the individual will make a quick recovery."

"Director Kuckuck, the University of California and the laboratory believe that any form of physical violence toward an individual is unacceptable. The laboratory is in contact with the Santa Fe Police Department and is providing the laboratory's full support and cooperation with the ongoing investigation."

Susan Hooks said that neither her husband's wallet, cell phone nor car were taken.

All Rights Reserved © NewsMax.com

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/6/6/210852.shtml
 
is a very odd thing to include in a statement by an institution concerning a "random beating" ...

Why would you put 'random beating' in quotes, LAK? Nowhere in the story is it even insinuated that anyone is painting this as a random assault.

A whistleblower got stomped by coworkers who didn't want their applecart overturned (or the resultant prison sentences that will accompany the cart-tipping.) This is sensational how? Ominous how? The slightest bit surprising how?
 
Why would you put 'random beating' in quotes, LAK? Nowhere in the story is it even insinuated that anyone is painting this as a random assault.
Well, the NewsMax link is but one of a great number of articles and other writings on this subject, and there is plenty of suggestion elsewhere that Hook was the victim of just another randon beating, not stating, but implying this as perhaps being connected to his lone venture to a strip club - and nothing to do with Los Alamos.

A whistleblower got stomped by coworkers who didn't want their applecart overturned (or the resultant prison sentences that will accompany the cart-tipping.) This is sensational how? Ominous how? The slightest bit surprising how?
Sensational? Maybe. If Rumsfeld tells us the Pentagon can not account for a couple of trillion dollars it is not unreasonable to speculate that the work of Tommy Hook may have only revealed the tip of an iceberg at Los Alamos. While we are not privy to actual figures and names, this article does mention fraud running into millions.

Ominous? Yes, I would say that the applecart is likely a great deal larger than that of just a few co-workers. Hook was due to tesify before Congress - not a grand jury over charges against a few individual co-workers.
 
Back
Top