Isn't it amazing that more restrictions on firearms lead to more and more violence on the unarmed? The passage of restrictive laws take more and more firearms out of the hands of the law abiding citizen and in effect put more in the hands of the criminal thus exposing law abiding citizens to greater risk of harm.
McDonald's and others who fire employees from resisting robberies send a message to criminals that future robberies should be easier because any employee who offers resistance will be fired.
Studies I have seen show that those who resist rapes, robberies and other acts of violence are injured less than those who submit.
I would think the action of McDonald's and other businesses who fire and or discipline employees who resist should lead to an increase in the number of law suits against such businesses because they are intentionally exposing their employees to more violence rather than less.
McDonald's and others who fire employees from resisting robberies send a message to criminals that future robberies should be easier because any employee who offers resistance will be fired.
Studies I have seen show that those who resist rapes, robberies and other acts of violence are injured less than those who submit.
I would think the action of McDonald's and other businesses who fire and or discipline employees who resist should lead to an increase in the number of law suits against such businesses because they are intentionally exposing their employees to more violence rather than less.