More Comfortable grips for S&W 340?

qkrthnu

New member
I've been interested in the AirLite guns from S&W. So I rented one to try it out. I was actually thinking about this gun for my wife due to the fact that it's super-light-weight, hamerless revolver makes it so attractive for a SD carry gun.

I didn't try .357 mag at all, just .38 spl. But after 50 rounds my hand was stinging quite a bit. The meaty part of my palm felt bruised for days. I know my wife would not be able to tolerate that and therefore wouldn't ever practice with the weapon.

Are there by chance some aftermarket grips for these guns that make it comfortable to shoot?

Thanks,

QKRTHNU
 
Make sure you get grips that won't prevent useing speed loaders.
I can't seem to find any that work with Houge bantam grips.
Any suggestions?
 
qkrthnu,
I recently purchased a 340PD for the specific purpose of pocket carry. The first thing I shot out of it was 158 gr. Fiocchi FMJ, which (at 960 fps) is as hot as any "+P" out there. And yes, it slapped the ____ out of my hand, with the stock boot-grips on. I'd suggest, first, that you try and find some 125 gr. ammo to shoot out of it. In a real standard pressure round, at least for me, this lighter bullet brings the level of recoil down to where it's really fun to shoot.

On the other hand, I got the .357 capable gun because I wanted to be able to shoot .357, and that I did for the first time today. I mail ordered two kinds of 'light' .357 from an internet store; the Remington Golden Saber and Proload's Tactical Light. Both are 125 gr. JHP, with well-designed bullets, and both hit around 1200 fps out of a 4" barrel--so, conservatively, 1100 out of a snub. Now these, I would not want to shoot 50 of in one session. Nor was I tempted, after a couple cylinders of each of these (and even apart from the ridiculous expense of 'em) to try any of the full-on 158 gr. .357s I had along for my L-frame. BUT, they can be shot, and accurately, and with the stock grips. Which brings us to your original question.

If I did not absolutely know I wanted to be able to comfortably carry this gun in my pocket, I would not have paid the premium for it. For any other mode of carry, for anyone who wants a .357, I think a heavier gun makes more sense. So, because pocket carry is the raison d'etre of this gun, I'm going to leave the stock grips on it, 'cause they're the smallest thing going--even though cleaning it after today's session will include cleaning a little blood off the backstrap. Now, I couldn't do this if I belonged to the 'practice with what you carry' school of thought. I like to shoot, and there's just no way I could afford to shoot that much of any premium ammo, which is the only thing good enough for carry IMHO. And, while I can take a little bit of punishment for the sake of competence, I'm not going to be shooting .357 by the crateload. I'm going to keep shooting a bunch of those easy-going 125 gr. standard velocity shells for fun and training, and then a cylinder of the premium stuff I plan to pack (probably the Pro-load; it was right on POA for my gun).

If the compact, lightweight and powerful package of the 340 appeals to you, then I just don't think it makes sense to bulk it up and defeat its prime virtues with bigger grips. But then, if you or your wife are sure you don't want to shoot .357s out of it as is (I know I'd never encourage my wife to shoot a .357 out of this thing), why not get a model 342, which is limited to .38 special? Jeez, that's a lot of writing, and I hope it isn't all unwelcome--but good luck at any rate with your decision.

cw
 
The grips for the small-frame Taurus are excellent. You need only to tap out the grip retention pin, as the hole is place differently on the Taurus guns. Next up is the UM's/BC grip with finger grooves. I cut it down nearly flush with the base of the frame. Both are really no bigger than the 'boot grips' available out there, and they provide a layer of rubber at the backstrap to take the sting out of the recoil.;)
 
VictorLouis is right...

The culprit in this is that exposed back-strap. It just slaps the SH** out of your hand. Cover that up, and things will be better.

KR
 
qkrthnu, When I bought my S&W-360Sc, it had the Hogue Bantam grips on it. I didn't like the way they felt when I dry-fired, or hot-fired the gun. I switched to the Uncle Mikes Combat grips, and now my 360Sc is a pleasure to dry-fire, or hot-fire.
I don't feel that the Uncle Mikes grips are much bigger than the Hogue grips, but I do feel that the Uncle Mikes grips are a lot more comfortable to use.
 
With the fly weight guns...S&W designed them for deep concealment and put the right grip on it for its intended purpose.
The exposed back strap is to make it a better Pocket carry gun and the boot grip really makes it better for that type of carry.
Changing the grip will help with the "OUCH" experienced when firing the gun but is just a trade off regarding concealment.
Butler Creek, Other S&W grips (lady smith), Hogue and alot of others make great grips for the gun......
Shoot well
 
Victor Louis, you are the man. I tried this on my M38 and WOW. I really like the fact the that this adds no lenght to the grip at all. Secondly, it covers that painful bare backstrap! Lastly, it seems to orient the gun in a more nose down position or rather you are able to "choke" up on the grip abit. This too helps in controlling these little handfuls. Thanks for that tip, as I had no idea.
 
Extremely Comfortable Grip

The Fitz "GF" Gunfighter grip was developed for off duty officers weapons for concealability and comfort and specifically for orienting to fire from the hip in the dark, right, left or two handed. It does not shorten the trigger finger and and has considerably more wood than the original Smith J frame grips. It has been carried by thousands of officers like myself.

It is the bottom center grip in the attachment in Cherry wood or duramite walnut or imitation stag. Try it you will like it!!
 

Attachments

  • fitz front page 3.jpg
    fitz front page 3.jpg
    17.4 KB · Views: 99
Back
Top