There may be no evidence (so far...) in Florida of permit-holder's names and addresses being used as a "shopping list" by criminals looking to steal guns, either; but Canada's seen it happen.
Conflating the release of the names of private citizens licensed to engage in a Constitutionally-protected activity with "government openness and accountability" is a wild leap of illogic. The underlying thought is that government should tuck us all safe in our beds and watch over each of us while we sleep. (There's a name for a place where it does just that: prison). While the Times is wishing, how about a list of felons and felons-to-be carrying weapons without a permit, too? They're the ones who present the greatest risk to others. Nationwide, persons with gun permits are less likely to commit crimes involving weapons than the general population.
Having not got "streets running red with blood" as predicted for each step in Florida's recognition of the basic human right of self-defense, some editorialists are determined to find reason for panic anyway. If the very wealthy are born with a silver spoon in their mouths, then editorial writers are born with a burr under their saddle. Or possibly even closer to their hearts.