Model 70
- Thread starter NHSHOOTER
- Start date
Could you make out what generation the rifle is? That might draw some more responses. My Model 70 is from around 1978 or so, and it had a horrible trigger that got replaced with a Rifle-Basix trigger. And I hate to stick my neck out there, but I don't believe I've ever heard of adjustable triggers on 70's, but then, I don't know much atall about these new ones.
mikejonestkd
New member
As 10-96 mentioned- the generation is important. Quality and workmanship range from average, to poor, to excellent - all depending on who made it and when.
For example - A newer model 70 made by FN is regarded as very good to excellent, some of the last ditch new Haven guns were poor.
Newer ones have an adj trigger- its called the MOA trigger.
http://www.winchesterguns.com/support/faq/moa-trigger-system.html
For example - A newer model 70 made by FN is regarded as very good to excellent, some of the last ditch new Haven guns were poor.
Newer ones have an adj trigger- its called the MOA trigger.
http://www.winchesterguns.com/support/faq/moa-trigger-system.html
I'm a fan of the Tikka and have a couple, one being a Tikka Lite in .243 Win. It's very accurate and easy to carry. The magazine feeds very well. It's taken several deer and a few coyotes, including a nice buck for me.
When I'm scouting or hauling my portable blind a mile or so, I take the Tikka. Once, while setting up the blind in our permanent ground blind, I saw the buck in the woods road, about 200 yards away. I grabbed the rifle while hiding behind the blind, stood up slowly, and bracing my left pinkie on top of the blind, nailed it in the boiler room. It served me well.
Not a fan of the older "controlled round feed" of the older Winchester 70s, but they were excellent rifles and they shot really well "out of the box". I don't have any experience with the foreign-made 70's of today.
When I'm scouting or hauling my portable blind a mile or so, I take the Tikka. Once, while setting up the blind in our permanent ground blind, I saw the buck in the woods road, about 200 yards away. I grabbed the rifle while hiding behind the blind, stood up slowly, and bracing my left pinkie on top of the blind, nailed it in the boiler room. It served me well.
Not a fan of the older "controlled round feed" of the older Winchester 70s, but they were excellent rifles and they shot really well "out of the box". I don't have any experience with the foreign-made 70's of today.
Winchester has been all over the place. The new FN built rifles made in South Carolina or Portugal have adjustable triggers and as a rule are as accurate as anything made. But that applies only to rifles made 2008-present.
The Winchester "Classics" which were the CRF rifles reintroduced in 1992-2006 can be very well made rifles. The ones made prior to 2000 are especially good. They will be made in New Haven and have 6 digit or less serial numbers. The ones with 7 digit serial numbers are when quality started to slide. Most made in the early 2000's are pretty good, but the closer you get to a 2006 manufacture date the greater the odds of a lemon.
I wouldn't risk the push feed rifles made in the 1960s or 1970's. Quality is spotty. Some are good, some are not.
Winchester was actually purchased by a group of investors in 1979. The 1980's and 1990's pushfeed rifles are generally pretty good. The "Classics" were brought back in 1992 and was Winchester top end rifle until they closed in 2006. But they continued to make their budget rifles on the pushfeed action until 2006. Just like the Classics, the ones made prior to 2000 are well made guns.
As a rule any of the pushfeed Winchesters made from 1980-1999 are pretty good rifles and are often sold at bargain prices.
The Winchester "Classics" which were the CRF rifles reintroduced in 1992-2006 can be very well made rifles. The ones made prior to 2000 are especially good. They will be made in New Haven and have 6 digit or less serial numbers. The ones with 7 digit serial numbers are when quality started to slide. Most made in the early 2000's are pretty good, but the closer you get to a 2006 manufacture date the greater the odds of a lemon.
I wouldn't risk the push feed rifles made in the 1960s or 1970's. Quality is spotty. Some are good, some are not.
Winchester was actually purchased by a group of investors in 1979. The 1980's and 1990's pushfeed rifles are generally pretty good. The "Classics" were brought back in 1992 and was Winchester top end rifle until they closed in 2006. But they continued to make their budget rifles on the pushfeed action until 2006. Just like the Classics, the ones made prior to 2000 are well made guns.
As a rule any of the pushfeed Winchesters made from 1980-1999 are pretty good rifles and are often sold at bargain prices.
While i do admire a Model 70, i've only had the opportunity to shoot one, once.
I have yet to own one. The "right rifle at the right price" and i have as yet to cross paths.
Now the Tikka....
Again, right rifle, right price. Hence i don't own one yet.
But after handling many, and being able to shoot a few. Is at the top of my short list to get.
Perhaps after i'm done paying on the Forbes, and get my new Mauser built.
I have yet to own one. The "right rifle at the right price" and i have as yet to cross paths.
Now the Tikka....
Again, right rifle, right price. Hence i don't own one yet.
But after handling many, and being able to shoot a few. Is at the top of my short list to get.
Perhaps after i'm done paying on the Forbes, and get my new Mauser built.
Don Fischer
New member
I've got a featherweight I got new about 2006. Adjustable trigger on it. Only Winchester bolt gun I ever owned. Shoot's very well but wouldn't call it a tack driver!
LineStretcher
New member
The newer rifles may have an adjustable trigger but try to remember that the Model 70 is a hunting rifle and the triggers are heavier than a match grade rifle. Keep it in perspective and you'll be fine. The .243 is a great little cartridge and a lot of fun too shoot.
Personally, I would probably lean towards the Tikka or maybe look for a Weatherby Vanguard. Both those rifles are in about the same class and shoot very well. I have a Tikka T3x lite Stainless in 22-250 and it shoots very well. I had a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight in 30-06 and it shot well but wasn't comfortable to shoot. I had a Vanguard in .243 that I setup for my neighbors wife and she loves it. The alternative would be to step over all three and look for a Browning X-Bolt. They seem to get more attention from Browning then the Winchesters. I had one in 300WSM and it was a tack driver with a very nice trigger.
Personally, I would probably lean towards the Tikka or maybe look for a Weatherby Vanguard. Both those rifles are in about the same class and shoot very well. I have a Tikka T3x lite Stainless in 22-250 and it shoots very well. I had a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight in 30-06 and it shot well but wasn't comfortable to shoot. I had a Vanguard in .243 that I setup for my neighbors wife and she loves it. The alternative would be to step over all three and look for a Browning X-Bolt. They seem to get more attention from Browning then the Winchesters. I had one in 300WSM and it was a tack driver with a very nice trigger.
The LGS I am going to tomorrow has a vanguard but with a synthetic stock, a Tikka with a wood stock (never fired) and the Model 70, I own a Tikka in 223 that is a tack driver, and a Vanguard in 243, 7-08 and 22-250 That are all tack drivers but this rifle is for my daughter and the vanguards are a tad heavier than the Tikka. In my mind right now I am thinking Tikka, adjustable trigger, walnut stock and light enough for her..I will post tomorrow eve after the sale. Again I really appreciate all the feedback!!!
Pathfinder45
New member
The original trigger system on the model 70 is adjustable Why the change to the newer M.O.A. trigger is something of a puzzle to me, as I really like the earlier version. That, "horrible trigger", that 10-96 mentioned, may have been defective, but without knowing more, I am inclined to believe that it merely needed a good adjustment. I had one from 1973 when I bought it new. It was a good rifle. I did adjust the trigger to get it down to a crisp 2 pound pull. Accuracy was OK, but not great, until my brother floated the barrel and bedded the receiver, and then, "Wow; this thing really shoots!". Wish I still had it.
My current model 70 is an even better rifle, a Classic Sporter that I got 2nd hand in a trade at a gunshow. I have owned it since 1998 and am not sure how old it actually is. I believe it is the best rifle I will ever own.
here is a good article on the model 70 Classic: https://westernrifleman.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/the-winchester-model-70-classic/
My current model 70 is an even better rifle, a Classic Sporter that I got 2nd hand in a trade at a gunshow. I have owned it since 1998 and am not sure how old it actually is. I believe it is the best rifle I will ever own.
here is a good article on the model 70 Classic: https://westernrifleman.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/the-winchester-model-70-classic/
Pathfinder45
New member
Yes, I concur.
As long as it has a Walnut stock, which is mandatory for me.
Last edited:
Model 70 Trigger Adjustment
The new Winchester 70 trigger adjustments allow adjusting weight and over-travel, but not pre-travel. Surely, that's to prevent most lawsuits, but pre-travel adjustment is part of adjusting for great trigger pull. It's not as important as overtravel or weight, but most people don't want a long, and especially gritty pre-travel. Smooth is where it's at!
The new Winchester 70 trigger adjustments allow adjusting weight and over-travel, but not pre-travel. Surely, that's to prevent most lawsuits, but pre-travel adjustment is part of adjusting for great trigger pull. It's not as important as overtravel or weight, but most people don't want a long, and especially gritty pre-travel. Smooth is where it's at!
I'm pretty sure the Model 70 trigger was essentially unchanged for at least 50 years of production, probably through all the New Haven production, and perhaps even until the MOA trigger was introduced.
That long in production original trigger design was a very simple with adjustments for weight and overtravel (but not travel/sear engagement). Not a match grade trigger, but a good trigger entirely suitable for a hunting rifle.
My 1991 production push feed medium weight varmint has that simple trigger and as adjusted it's both reasonably light and crisp.
That long in production original trigger design was a very simple with adjustments for weight and overtravel (but not travel/sear engagement). Not a match grade trigger, but a good trigger entirely suitable for a hunting rifle.
My 1991 production push feed medium weight varmint has that simple trigger and as adjusted it's both reasonably light and crisp.
Yes...I remember two small hex-nuts. One jammed against the other to prevent moving after adjusting. As I remember, it only adjusted the amount of engagement.