Million Mom Mole

dZ

New member
Million Mom Mole

FrontPageMagazine.com | September 27, 2000 http://FrontPageMagazine.com/archives/guest_column/metaksa/metaksa09-28-00.htm



ISN’T IT AMAZING how a “grass roots event” has blossomed overnight into a national political organization?
The press releases issued by the Million Mom March (MMM) last spring were designed to give the illusion
that the MMM was being run by a few well-meaning “Moms” from their kitchen table. The media bought into
that fairy tale, hook, line and sinker. After all, the chief organizer, Donna Dees-Thomases, who was described
by Time magazine as “a housewife and mother of two children from New Jersey,” signed her letter on their
web page, as "Just One of a Million." It wasn’t until a commentary appeared in the Wall Street Journal by Lisa
Schiffren that Ms. Dees-Thomases was exposed for what she was: a very clever member of the vast left-wing
Clinton conspiracy.

Dees-Thomases is not only the sister-in-law of Susan Thomases, Hillary
Clinton’s closest friend, confidant, and political advisor, but she was also a
very well-connected public relations expert, who had worked for a United
States Senator, for Dan Rather, and was on leave from David Letterman at
the time of the march. She cleverly used her contacts and political friends to
turn the MMM into a media spectacular. The day of the march, she and 1,000
of her friends and organizers visited with Bill and Hillary at the White House prior to the event.

The actual march fell way short of the million Moms expected, even though the March organizers got city
officials in Richmond, Virginia to pay for bus transportation. The announcement read:

A CARAVAN of buses will leave from Richmond at 7 a.m., at the Arthur Ashe
Center, 3001 N. Boulevard, to transport persons interested in attending the
million mom march in Washington, D.C. on Sunday the 14th of May, and return
approximately at 6 p.m. The bus ride is free. To reserve a seat or for more
details, call Teresa Dayrit, (804) 358-4646, or contact her by e-mail at:
richmondmmm@mediaone.net

The Richmond Times Dispatch of May 15 affirmed that “the city of Richmond paid for eight buses to take
gun-control advocates to the Million Mom March City,” costing taxpayers approximately $6,000. Some of these
women, when asked why they went, answered, “It was a free trip to D.C., why not?”

Many of the Moms left the march early to go the nearest Northern Virginia shopping mall. At Pentagon City
mall, one of the marchers identified by her Million Mom March t-shirt, said, "Sure, I took one of the buses here.
I've never been to Washington. It was a good chance to see the monuments and do a little shopping. It was
something different to do on Mother's Day."

Additional allegations have surfaced that Northwest Airlines sold cut-rate round-trip tickets from the West
Coast to the March. Senator Diane Feinstein’s (D-CA) husband is affiliated with Northwest, and her office
purportedly publicized the ticket availability.

Schoolteachers and administrators also enticed their students to attend. Maryland School officials admitted
that the PTA fliers sent home with students endorsed the Million Mom March, and students who attended the
march were allowed to count that time towards the graduation requirement of 75 hours of “student service
learning.”

The march also had its share of victims; people who had suffered as a result of the criminal use of firearms
or gun accidents. Many stories were poignant and heartbreaking. One victim was Barbara Lipscomb, a
mother and grandmother, whose son, Le’Pierre Clemons, was “gunned down” on Martin Luther King Jr’s
birthday just four months prior. Le’Pierre was another victim of teenage violence in the nation’s capitol, and
his mom told everyone she was going to the MMM to stop the violence.

Yet, 2 months later, on July 14, 2000 Barbara Lipscomb, now known as Barbara Ann Martin, found herself
under arrest on a charge of assault with intent to kill. According to the Washington Post, D.C. police say they
found “three handguns and a TEC-9 submachine gun at her home.”

Her arrest resulted from an attack on a 21-year-old man who was shot three times with one of those bullets
lodging in his spine. The attack occurred on January 26th, less than two weeks after Le’Pierre’s murder. The
police commander of the 7th District explained the January 26th shooting as “a vigilante antic that went awry
…this was an innocent man, and now he is paralyzed.” It obviously was an act of violence and retribution by a
woman who supported and was supported by the MMM.

Surprisingly, it isn’t the only instance of A Million-Mom Marcher getting aggressive. According to the Boulder
Weekly of March 30, 2000, Robert Howell, vice-president of the Boulder Chapter of the Bell Campaign,
attacked Shariar Ghalam, while Ghalam was exercising his First Amendment rights to speak in favor of gun
control at a rally before a speech by Charlton Heston, President of the National Rifle Association. Then, on
August 15th another MMM member accosted a gun owner who had a video camera. The cameraman was
taping a public organizational meeting of MMM in Fort Collins, CO, when the MMM member hit the camera
with a clipboard causing damage to his eye. It seems that there is little respect for the First and Fourth
Amendment rights of those who disagree, by the members of the Colorado chapters of the MMM.

The MMM is now showing its true colors. According to several women who attended its first annual
convention several weeks ago, the thrust of the MMM this fall is to elect Al Gore. The MMM has become what it
was always intended to become: a full-fledged coordinated campaign with the Democratic Party to help elect
the Gore-Lieberman ticket. This comment on their web site demonstrates their political focus plainly.

The New York Times reports that the NRA, which is spending millions and
millions of dollars to support Governor Bush, is not expected to officially
endorse him. The reason: they’ll help the Governor more by NOT giving him a
formal endorsement.

As a “non-political action committee” they have received tremendous funding from several not-for-profit
organizations: They received a million dollars from the Packard Foundation and a staggering five million from
the Emma Goldman foundation, and another million dollars anonymously. Their convention raised
approximately $35,0000. Although those funds cannot be used for direct contributions to candidates, you can
bet they will be used to “educate” voters about the stands of candidates on the issue of gun control and direct
those voters to the appropriate campaigns.

To quote from the report of an attendee at the MMM convention:

All of their media people, lobbyists, speakers, organizers, photographers, are
seasoned professionals. They literally have the very best that money can buy.
They are stacked with folks who have worked in many, many liberal causes and
campaigns and take many years of experience with them to the political arena.
The Million Mom March is anything but a grass roots group of angry housewives
and mothers, wanting to protect the children.

It has become crystal clear that the MMM is full of rank-and-file members of the liberal wing of the Democratic
party, who are being orchestrated by the Democratic National Committee, the Gore Campaign, and all the
Clinton advisors. It was never a small group of Moms around a kitchen table, but a small group of political
and public relations professionals, who are taking the gun control agenda to a new and higher level - a level
designed to help anti-gun Democrats keep control of the White House and retake control of the Congress.



Tanya K. Metaksa is the former executive director of the National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative
Action. She is the author of Safe, Not Sorry, a self-protection manual, published in 1997. She has
appeared on numerous talk and interview shows such as "Crossfire," the "Today" show, "Nightline," "This
Week with David Brinkley" and the "McNeil-Lehrer Hour," among others.
 
My letter to the Denver Compost (re:Oatka's letter to Jenny Deam)

Good Afternoon,

After Reading your article, Million Mom March modeled after
MADD, i had some pressing questions that left me looking
for further information.

Questions such as:

Where did [McGuire] get this funding? Does the Bell Campaign
make a distinction between innocent deaths and deaths as a
result of a lawful defence, (i.e. deaths that result from responsible
use)? If not, how is this a comparison to MADD? How many
people where at the DC, Million Mom Martch? So instead of
focusing on the cause of violence, we desire to change the tool?

After reading this: Million Mom Mole http://FrontPageMagazine.com/archives/guest_column/metaksa/metaksa09-28-00.htm

My questions were answered and now i know the whole story.

Thank you.




------------------
~USP

"[Even if there would be] few tears shed if and when the Second Amendment is held to guarantee nothing more than the state National Guard, this would simply show that the Founders were right when they feared that some future generation might wish to abandon liberties that they considered essential, and so sought to protect those liberties in a Bill of Rights. We may tolerate the abridgement of property rights and the elimination of a right to bear arms; but we should not pretend that these are not reductions of rights." -- Justice Scalia 1998
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by USP45:
After reading this: Million Mom Mole http://FrontPageMagazine.com/archives/guest_column/metaksa/metaksa09-28-00.htm[/quote]

Sorry, after viewing this article, I just couldn't help myself . . .

rosie.jpg


zook
 
I know :D



------------------
~USP

"[Even if there would be] few tears shed if and when the Second Amendment is held to guarantee nothing more than the state National Guard, this would simply show that the Founders were right when they feared that some future generation might wish to abandon liberties that they considered essential, and so sought to protect those liberties in a Bill of Rights. We may tolerate the abridgement of property rights and the elimination of a right to bear arms; but we should not pretend that these are not reductions of rights." -- Justice Scalia 1998
 
Back
Top