Michael Moore speaks on Lieberman loss!

"To Hillary, our first best hope for a woman to become president, I cannot for the life of me figure out why you continue to support Bush and his war. I'm sure someone has advised you that a woman can't be elected unless she proves she can kick ass just as crazy as any man. I'm here to tell you that you will never make it through the Democratic primaries unless you start now by strongly opposing the war. It is your only hope. You and Joe have been Bush's biggest Democratic supporters of the war."

Does this mean Mrs. C will be the next to go?
 
What it means to me is that Moore is telling Hillary to change her position on the war, because he believes she has a real chance of winning.

The others (Kerry, Edwards..etc), simply changing your position is not good enough, because you have no chance of winning.
 
Moore is nothing but a freelance hitman and pirate. He's not even a democrat, but he aligns himself with them because nobody would take a pseudo - socialist seriously. Sounds like he's telling Hillary that she's his next target unless she starts preaching his message (whatever the hell it is). Serves her right if she was one of the ones kissing his fat butt over "Fahrenheit 9/11". You can bet at the end of the day he still votes Republican - simply because it's good for business and keeps his bank account full.
 
The bottom line is if you do not follow in Lockstep with Moore, and more importantly Soros, the party leadership has no loyalty to you. Soros owns the party now because he is their cash man and Moore is a big mouth who parrots what Soros wants. I don't think it is a case of Moore following Soros's orders. I think Moore just has the same agenda.

Lieberman getting tossed is a perfect example to the blue collar Democrats out there that they are not welcome in the party unless they agree 100% with the lunatic fringe that has taken over. Just as the Libertarians shoot themselves in the foot by not embracing anyone outside their 100% ideal the Democrats are now following the same path.

We all may scream about RINOs such as Pataki, Schwartzenegger and Gullianni but they do prove something through their very existance. They prove that the Republican party is open to those who are not automatons.
 
When a politico changes their position on something as big as this it can only be construed as blatantly offensive to the minds of all who listen . I would respect someones position if they TRULY believed it . I may not agree but respect the passion . When a person changes their stand just to win an election they are announcing to all the world that they are willing to say anything to get elected . After which they will return to what they were until it comes time again to say what people want to hear and not what you really think . This has nothing to do with passion and everything to do with perception .
 
Can anyone name a politician either party who works for and cares about the
middle-class/working person.? Federal level, please.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top