Maybe the AARP should read this

sumabich

Moderator
I read a post earlier by Monkeyleg "taking on NBC" and in the post someone mentioned the AARP's current support of GCI. The author stated correctly that as we age our physical capacities diminish and that the gun can be the great equalizer. Here are two local examples that happened in the Charlotte area while the NRA was in town. The first was in Charlotte:
CHARLOTTE (AP) One day before gun rights advocates took to the streets of Charlotte with signs and T-shirts proclaiming “guns save lives,” a Charlotte man shot and killed an intruder who broke into his home.
Roy Parker told police he was awakened about 1:30 a.m. Friday by the sound of shattering glass, his mother screaming and a family dog barking.
Armed with a handgun, Parker crept downstairs and saw an intruder using an iron chair to break through the sunroom window.
Parker, 51, said he fired at least two warning shots, then shot the intruder in the neck.
“He just kept coming,” Parker said. Charlotte-Mecklengurg police found the body of Mitchell Regis, 24, lying on the back patio of the two-story house. Police would not say how many times Parker fired his gun. Regis was unarmed.
“I’m just devastated that I had to use deadly force to keep someone from killing me,” Parker said, “It was by far the most dreadful thing I’ve ever had to go through I was left with no choice. May God help anyone else who has to go through this.”
The shooting marked the 3rd time this year that a home owner or business owner in Charlotte has killed an intruder. Under N.C. law, homeowners have the right to use deadly force if they fear that their lives are in danger. (Actually in N.C. the use of deadly force comes into play once the person gets into the house. You can shoot through a wall or door etc. if you believe someone is trying to break into the house without using the deadly force law!) Parker said Regis, who had a criminal record…… (Another defenseless child killed by a handgun!).
The second report comes from the big city of Grover N.C. (45 minutes west of Charlotte) Population less than 1000 as published in the Shelby Star May 21,2000.
GROVER -- three men were shot Friday night after two men broke into a home on Mallard Drive, said the Cleveland County Sheriff’s Office.
About 9:30 p.m. James Charlie Panther of 302 Mallard Drive, Grover, N.C. 28073 (I published his address with zip which wasn’t in the paper some of you folks write him a letter to help in his recuperation) who is 68 years old, heard a knock at his door. Thinking it to be his neighbor, he opened the door, said CC Sheriff’s officer Scot Chapman.
A man wearing a ski mask then hit Panther in the head with his fist, knocking him down. Then another man cam into the house, Chapman said.
The man with the ski mask took Panthers wallet and began to wrestle with him. Panther then started shooting his gun and the second man ran down Panther’s hallway. During the struggle between Panther and the man wearing the ski mask, the man took Panther’s gun and shot him in the wrist.
Panther was treated at Cleveland Regional Medical Center and released. One suspect, Derrick Adams of Deep Green Drive in Shelby, underwent surgery and remained in the hospital in stable condition late Saturday. Adams, shot in the chest and abdomen, was located in a gully at Mallard Drive and Lavender Road by Grover Police Chief Ed Pheagin. Another suspect, Darius Ross was shot in the elbow and deputies were still looking for him. (Note in the same paper two pages over, was a list of unsolved county crimes 6 were home and car break-ins in the little town of Grover. I think Mr. Panther just might have stopped a crime spree! I plan to call or go visit tomorrow).
Pass this on wherever you think it will do good!
 
I think the first place this should be passed to is the AARP. We should also find out, where applicable, if these and other victims are members of their organization.

------------------
Gun Control: The proposition that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her own panty hose, is more acceptable than allowing that same woman to defend herself with a firearm.
 
Good idea, jimpeel.

Their bulletin: bulletin@aarp.org

If somebody will forward the above, I'll go back through the Armed Citizen archives and send them clips on anybody over 50.
 
Just a quick update. Mr. Panther has changed his number to an unlisted so there is no way for me to call him. If I get a chance this week I will try to stop in and see him. If this is any indication, one of my staff had a vehicle break down Sunday evening in the general vicinity and said after a gentleman answered the door he pointed a loaded 9 mm in his face. Guess the neighborhood is on a high state of alert!
 
I have read several replies from the President of AARP or whatever his title is, in their news letter. My folks belong (other than that they are fine people :) ) and it was their magazine. Anyway, all the statements were of the "Guns hurt people, to keep from being hurt, you should not have guns. We know best, you Simple Moron." type.

AARP is not a real group such as LEAA or NRA where there is a chance for your views to be heard and election of officers. IT started as an insurance program and moved from there.

------------------
Ne Conjuge Nobiscum
"If there be treachery, let there be jehad!"
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Jim V:
I have read several replies from the President of AARP or whatever his title is, in their news letter. My folks belong (other than that they are fine people :) ) and it was their magazine. Anyway, all the statements were of the "Guns hurt people, to keep from being hurt, you should not have guns. We know best, you Simple Moron." type.

AARP is not a real group such as LEAA or NRA where there is a chance for your views to be heard and election of officers. IT started as an insurance program and moved from there.

[/quote]

That's correct...what I've read of the AARP is that they aren't actively anti-rights, but more a a collateral effect of their lobbying.
I'm 50...one of the joys of turning fifty is that one starts getting AARP information. Well, they won't get my nickle as long as they're anti-rights!
 
Zeke,

The bad news is AARP apparently gets a federal government subsidy of some kind. Membership is cheap, I get discounts on motels, etc., but most importantly, when they mouth off about gun control I am first in line to hear it.

I'm a member of AARP - not a proud member, but a member. I have written many letters to Congress, the President, and others saying the AARP is an insurance company - they do NOT speak for me.

Oh, BTW, I'm a *proud* member of NRA, LEAA, JPFO, CCRKBA, GOA, SAF, Doctors for Responsible Gun Ownership, CHL Instructors Ass'n, VFW, American Legion, Air Force Association, NCOA, Berlin Island Ass'n, and a few others (the mind tires easily these days).

No wonder I have to work! All my income goes to pay my dues (again)! :D :D

------------------
Either you believe in the Second Amendment or you don't.
Stick it to 'em! RKBA!



[This message has been edited by Dennis (edited May 22, 2000).]
 
If no pro-firearms people join the organization, there will be nothing but anti-firearms people in the organization. This is silly thinking on our part as the best was to have a say in the debate is not to remove oneself from the sphere of influence. I am a member of AARP for just that reason and I knew they were anti when I joined.

------------------
Gun Control: The proposition that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her own panty hose, is more acceptable than allowing that same woman to defend herself with a firearm.
 
The folks who run AARP care not one iota for the political opinions of the membership. They will indeed lobby for "old folks" causes, but the management has its own liberal agenda.

The large number of AARP members who are in it strictly for the insurance and the motel discounts give them an undeserved amount of clout.

Congressfolks say that Lobby Group #1 is the AARP; #2 is the NRA.

FWIW, Art
 
Back
Top