They've just had 12 people killed and some more wounded in the UK by some guy with a shotgun and a .22 rifle who drove around shooting people, some at point blank range, at more than 30 crime scenes. The shooter belonged to a gun club, so more than likely, the guns were "legal" under UK law.
My question is, where are the reporters talking about how the UK gun laws failed to stop a mass shooting? Why aren't they asking why gun control has failed to reduce violent crime in the UK? Why aren't they reporting that violent crime in which guns are used is UP since they made their gun laws more "strict" after a previous mass shooting? I guess 12 people murdered by a loony with a gun in a country where guns are extremely hard to "legally" possess, just isn't very newsworthy to the US media. I wonder why?
My question is, where are the reporters talking about how the UK gun laws failed to stop a mass shooting? Why aren't they asking why gun control has failed to reduce violent crime in the UK? Why aren't they reporting that violent crime in which guns are used is UP since they made their gun laws more "strict" after a previous mass shooting? I guess 12 people murdered by a loony with a gun in a country where guns are extremely hard to "legally" possess, just isn't very newsworthy to the US media. I wonder why?