Man Sues Over Arrest for Taping Police Chief

Skyhawk

New member
Story

Man Sues Over Arrest for Taping Police Chief
Aspiring Filmmaker Spent Three Days in Wash. Jail
July 24, 2000

By Randy Dotinga

SEQUIM, Wash. (APBnews.com) -- Six months ago, an aspiring filmmaker videotaped his way into a three-day stint behind bars.

Now, Tony Johnson is creating some off-screen drama by suing the police chief of this small town for $5 million.

Johnson alleges that he was wrongly thrown in jail after he innocently videotaped police chief Byron Nelson during a visit to a Sequim skateboard park.

Nelson declined to talk to APBnews.com about the case, and his attorney did not return phone calls.

Ignored orders to stop taping

Attorney Stuart Phillips, who is representing 23-year-old Johnson, a film student at a local community college, said his client was videotaping some friends at the skateboard park on Jan. 28 when he saw the police chief pull up.

"He started filming the police chief and saw him looking over at the group [of skateboarders]," Phillips said. "The police were instrumental in getting the skate park built, so he thought that connection would make an interesting segment in a film he was trying to make."

The police chief ordered Johnson to stop filming and told him repeatedly that he could not record without permission, Phillips said. The chief "put him in an arm hold and a chokehold and knocked him to the ground," Phillips said. A friend of Johnson's grabbed the video camera and filmed part of the arrest.

The videotape of the incident shows Johnson spread-eagled over the hood of a vehicle as he was arrested.

Johnson spent three days in jail on charges of recording a private conversation. A judge then threw the case out, Phillips said.

No right of privacy, suit claims

The lawsuit, filed on June 16, contends that Johnson was wronged because police have no right to privacy when they are working.

"They violated his First Amendment rights," Phillips said. "He was actively engaged in making a film. He had a right to be in public and record things in public.

"Whenever the police are able to put themselves in the role of a censor on what you can record and put in a film, they're setting themselves up as a police state," the attorney said. "It's very dangerous when police start setting themselves up as arbiters of what can and cannot be recorded."

The case hinges on a Washington state law that prohibits the recording of private conversations without consent of both parties. Phillips said courts have declared that the law doesn't cover police activity in public.

Phillips is also representing a Bremerton, Wash., man who was arrested when he tried to tape-record a state patrol officer during a traffic stop in 1997. That case has yet to go to trial.

Randy Dotinga is an APBnews.com West Coast correspondent (randy.dotinga@apbnews.com).
 
There's a group in Berkeley, CA called "Berkeley Copwatch" that makes a hobby of running around filming BPD in action. They've collected strong case law supporting what they're doing and the official city/PD take is "as long as they're not interfering, we can't touch 'em".

They've successfully gotten people out of jail when the cop's stories don't match what's on film, most recently at the Pacifica Radio protests/strike.

I'll see if I can't track down Copwatch and Phillips by EMail, get Phillips some ammo. Both WA and CA are in the 9th Circuit so there's a good chance case law from around here will apply.

Jim
 
You know, that's REALLY funny considering that Washington State Police were some of the first in the country to put video cameras AND audio equipment in patrol cars to film police stops!

Does that mean that EVERY citizen stopped by police in Washington can sue?

I smell one hell of a big class action lawsuit!

------------------
Beware the man with the S&W .357 Mag.
Chances are he knows how to use it.
 
I found this little story interesting for a couple of reasons;

Skateboarding – Most kids that are skateboarding these days are demonized for doing so. They are banned and harassed by the authorities. I would say the majority, if not all, are just normal kids “hanging out” and having a good time. (Back in the 70’s I used to “ride” one of those wooden numbers with steel wheels.)

Video/Audio Recording – Seems OK for the authorities to surveil and record the general public without constrains but turn the tables and “The chief put him in an arm hold and a chokehold and knocked him to the ground". WTF?

General Infringement of Rights by the authorities for no good reason – Firearm owners aren’t the only ones! Grrrr... :mad:

Skyhawk
 
There is no right to privacy concerning being videotaped in a public place. You cannot broadcast or otherwise use a person's image without their permission, but videotaping is protected. The chief got peeved and decided to throw his weight around. If I were on the jury, I'd throw the book at him.
 
Back
Top