MA: Some people get a brain

MicroBalrog

New member
Originally published on Monday, October 18, 2004 in the News section of The Harvard Crimson.

Students Carry Mace Illegally
By LIZ C. GOODWIN
Contributing Writer

When living in Cambridge last summer, Brittani S. Head ’06 carried pepper spray to ease the late-night walk home, halfway to Central Square.

“During the summer the campus is much more deserted, and carrying the pepper spray made me feel a lot safer,” Head said.

Many students on campus purchased self-defense chemicals in the wake of more than a dozen sexual assaults in the vicinity of the campus last year, despite the fact that carrying mace or pepper spray is illegal without the proper license.

Head, who no longer carries the spray, said that she was vaguely aware of the law against carrying mace without a license, but felt that her safety was more important.

“I think it’s kind of a stupid law,” she said.

To legally carry mace or any chemical irritant in Massachusetts, you must obtain a valid firearm identification card (FID)—a process which, in Cambridge, requires proof of U.S. citizenship, proof of Cambridge residence, fingerprinting and background checks. There is a fee of $25 for the license and an extra $20 fingerprinting fee.

“It’s a dangerous chemical if used improperly,” Harvard University Police Department (HUPD) spokeswoman Peggy McNamara said. “You can blind and permanently impair people with it.

Police officers all have to be personally sprayed with it to understand the impact of it.”

A junior in Dunster began carrying mace last winter, after a student was assaulted in the parking lot of St. Paul’s Church.

“I felt like that could have happened to any of us,” said the junior, who spoke on condition of anonymity because she knew the mace possession was illegal. “So my blockmates and I ordered pepper spray on keychains over eBay.”

The junior said that the mace, for which none of the students had a license, makes her feel more confident walking the streets, and reminds her to be aware of her surroundings.

Prompted by two recent rapes in the Mission Hill and Jamaica Plain neighborhoods, the Boston Police Licensing Division stayed open late, earlier this month, to field increased demand for licenses to carry chemical irritants.

Susan Marine, director of the Office of Sexual Assault Response and Prevention, said she has seen an increased student interest in obtaining mace over the past few weeks, possibly due to these same rapes.

“If people call us about how to get mace, we refer them to the police,” Marine said. “We don’t take a stance on mace either way, but I understand it’s very controversial because it is often used against the victim in assaults.”

Others started carrying spray for personal reasons. Annelisa H. Pedersen ’06 said she carries pepper spray to protect herself from a potentially dangerous ex-boyfriend.

“I don’t know if I should be carrying this around because you have to have a firearm ID card,” Pedersen said. “I’m from Georgia where it’s completely legal if you’re over 18.”

Pedersen said she didn’t even realize mace was illegal in Massachusetts until she tried to board a plane, forgetting about the mace hanging on her keychain.

“A policeman talked to me at the airport, but I didn’t get into any trouble,” Pedersen said. “I just think it’s more important to be able to defend yourself.”

Coalition Against Sexual Assault Board Member Laura E. Openshaw ’05 said that the process of getting an FID is too difficult.

“Mace is primarily a defense weapon,” Openshaw said. “A fee and fingerprinting seem extreme.”

McNamara urged students to explore self-defense alternatives to mace and other chemical irritants.

“We sell shrill alarms for ten dollars, you could carry a whistle, or take Rape Aggression Defense classes,” McNamara said. “Travel in groups, walk in well-lit areas. The shuttle service and the walking escort services are all ways to stay safe.”

Some students feel so safe that they’ve ignored mace sent by concerned family members.

“I don’t carry around the mace my parents gave me because I haven’t even thought about it,” Tiffany T. Niver ’08 said. “I feel safe and it wouldn’t even be natural to carry around. It wouldn’t be much use in the bottom of my bag anyway, if I did get attacked.”

“My mother sent me up a new can of pepper spray, but I just haven’t carried it,” Head said.


Go back to original article.
Copyright © 2004, The Harvard Crimson Inc. All rights reserved.
 
:confused: I'm looking for the part where somebody got a brain... a little help please?

They sound like most of the pathetically defenseless Massachusetts sheeple I left behind. As an aside, I wish words could describe how wonderful it is to be 3,000 miles away from that liberal den of iniquity. Suffice it to say that it is fantastic.

FWIW Sarah Brady is just about as lifelong Republican as I am a lifelong Marxist. It is true that she is married to a Republican, but that's about it. And after he got shot, all bets were definitely off. R.I.N.O. maybe... Republican never.
 
It gets better. Even if you get an FID or LTC, that doesn't mean you can carry mace on campus in MA. You would need written permission from the school to do so, and you won't get it.
 
"We strive to provide empathic, supportive services to students of the College who have experienced sexual assault."

That "Office of Sexual Assault Response and Prevention" appears to lead women to be easy assault victims and offers a shoulder to cry on after...
 
“Mace is primarily a defense weapon,” Openshaw said. “A fee and fingerprinting seem extreme.”

There ya go. According to this person, defensive weapons don;t need a license. Since your carry gun is a defensive weapon, the, I think you can fill in the rest ;)
 
Fred: At least they realize the need to protect themselves. An important first step.

Neil Smith said:
Sarah Brady, principal advocate of gun control in America, and her sideshow-exhibition husband still call themselves "conservative Republicans".
National Review editor and Republican television personality William F. Buckley has endorsed the passage of the Brady Bill (just like Ronald Reagan, although he later had the sense to withdraw his endorsement).
Republican writer/theorist George F. Will called for repeal of the Second Amendment months before NBC News ex-president Michael Gartner did.
Every Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to approve Bill Clinton's nomination to U.S. Attorney General of the notorious Florida anti-gun prosecutor Janet Reno, following which, every Republican in the Senate voted to approve the nomination, as well.
And recently on Face The Nation, Jack Kemp, Great White Hope of conservative Republican, advocated an immediate, universal ban on semiautomatics.
It should be obvious to anyone what's happening here. Unable to cope intellectually with the quirky results of a three-way race, anxious to follow the example of a man they mistakenly believe won the election (in fact, Bill Clinton was handed the Presidency by Ross Perot), the Republican leadership have decided to "move to the center" -- and they're doing it by dumping the constituencies they consider "marginal".
How does it feel to be considered marginal?
How does it feel to be dumped?
Is there anyone with any brains, integrity, or courage left in the Republican Party?
More important, how long must we go on licking the Republican boot that's kicking us?
In times like these, it's well to remember that Wyatt Earp, the first advocate of gun control, was a Republican. And it's enough to make you wish the battle of the O.K. Corral had turned out differently.
 
When there was a serial rapist on the loose in a Boston suburb, the chief of police noted the spike in chemical spray license applications and complained about women "arming themselves to the teeth."

That guy deserves a spot right next to the rapist in the boiling inferno.
 
Back
Top