GUNS-AMMO@onelist.com wrote:
eGroups.
The best way to communicate by email in a group.
Start your own free email group! http://click.egroups.com/1/1885/4/_/444881/_/951476363/
-----
There is 1 message in this issue.
Topics in today's digest:
1. Re: I.D. for job $ driver's lic.
From: ron3817@webtv.net
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 15:32:44 -0500 (EST)
From: ron3817@webtv.net
Subject: Re: I.D. for job $ driver's lic.
What follows is one of the most disturbing stories I have ever done in
my
11 years as your editor. (American Sentinel). Please pay close attention
to
the information contained in this lead story. At its conclusion, I offer
an
effective "Action Plan" for each reader to take in their own state.
Buried
at approximately page 650 of a national defense bill (HR 3610, passed by
370 votes in the House of Representatives, September 28, 1996, each
states'
department of motor vehicles will require fingerprints (or other form of
"biometric" identification) as a condition of obtaining a driver's
license,
no later than October 1, 2000.
STATE FINGERPRINTING OF DRIVERS IS DIRECTED FROM WASHINGTON Universal
fingerprint program hidden from public view Road to Serfdom?
It's no accident that universal fingerprinting is being imposed by the
central authorities through state departments of motor vehicles (DMV).
(Backers of universal fingerprinting fear a national backlash, should
plans
for its implementation become public knowledge.) By making it appear
fingerprinting drivers is a state DMV decision, instead of a federal
mandate, the perpetrators this assault on the Constitution enjoy
enormous
political cover. Already, several states (Texas, Colorado, Georgia and
California) have implemented a requirement that all drivers submit
fingerprinting. In most cases, the above-mentioned state legislators are
complying with a federal fingerprint pilot program. Details on how this
came about and what it means to YOU follow: State DMV's are quietly
implementing federal fingerprint decree Section 656 of HR 3610 states
that "after October 1, 2000, Federal agencies
may only accept as proof of identity driver's licenses that conform to
the
standard developed by the Secretary of the Treasury," after consultation
with the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA).
Section 326 and 327 of the law provide $5 million per year to states
participating in any of the three federal pilot program requiring
"biometric" identification (i.e., confirmed through fingerprint, voice
analysis or retina pattern) of drivers. The AAMVA has repeatedly
testified
that it strongly favors the fingerprinting option. (Pull out and check
your
own driver's license; 22 states have quietly added a magnetic strip in
preparation to transmit YOUR "biometric" data to the national registry
now
being developed.)
Revealed: The perpetrators of this national fingerprint mandate
The last thing that the authors of the emerging national ID want is
debate
and discussion. It began on May 10, 1995, at a hearing held by the
Senate
Subcommittee on Immigration entitled "Verification of Applicant Identity
for the Purposes of Employment and Public Assistance." The hearing was
chaired by former Senator ALAN SIMPSON (R-WY) and attended by Senators
TEDDY KENNEDY (D-MA), DIANNE FEINSTEIN (D-CA) and JOHN KYLE (R-AZ). It
was
from this hearing that FEINSTEIN telegraphed federal intentions to
impose a
nation identity system. In remarks made on May 10, SIMPSON added: "I was
just saying to Ted (Kennedy) before he left, a hearing like
this fifteen years ago, would have torn the building down. And here we
are
today, kind of sitting around and no media, no nothing. This is fine
with
me. I get tired of them on this issue."
Federal fingerprint mandate is carefully camouflaged Section 656 of Hr
3610
mandating universal fingerprints which originally sprang from the
"Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act," signed by BILL
CLINTON in September 1996. Its provisions overlapped federal tracking
system to identify and deny employment to deadbeat dads. Enabling
legislation to provide a universal, federally accepted I.D. was rolled
into
the national defense bill, HR 3610 (roll call vote #455). In an
interview
with MICHAEL MYERS of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, he
acknowledged that now-departed SIMPSON staffer CHIP WOOD inserted
section
656, to create a federal fingerprint pilot program through state DMV's.
MYERS declined to identify the remaining staffers responsible for
slipping
section 656 into the defense appropriations bill.
Justice Department refuses to disclose details of fingerprint program My
research assistant SHANNON MUNZE made repeated calls to the Justice
Department, seeking details on the administration of the section 656
"Machine Readable Document Pilot (fingerprint) program." She spoke with
Justice attorney MICHAEL HUGHES, who acknowledged the existence of the
initiative, but informed us that any information concerning its
operational
details are not available to the Public (we're now proceeding on a FOIA
request).
If universal fingerprinting is such a good idea, why the deception? This
story was difficult to unearth because there is no one piece of
legislation declaring "we have a national I.D.!" First, the central
government is directing states to make all drivers' licenses "federally"
compatible, through biometric identification (i.e. fingerprints, etc.).
It's all to accommodate separate legislation requiring instant
background
checks on new employees in the private sector. (Some Republicans cheer
this
intrusion, because the new generation of federally-approved state
driver's
licenses will give Washington the power to enforce severe sanctions
against
deadbeat dads, tax cheats and other "undesirables.") These tamper-proof
IDs
will also be required to use credit cards and write checks (part of the
government's "antifraud" campaign). The upshot is this: Under new
immigration and "deadbeat dad" sanction laws. You will be denied
employment
without a federally-approved biometric driver's license after October 1,
2000! Not even the Nazis attained this kind of power. Why you must help
fight the national ID
In early test states such as Georgia, imposition of the central
government's fingerprint decree was so well camouflaged that local
activists were unable to mobilize against it in time. (Activists in
Alabama
thwarted the fingerprint scheme.) Here's what YOU can do to defeat this
threat to our liberties:
First-Action-to Take: Contact DMV. Ask the responsible official if your
state DMV has plans or is considering proposals to require "Biometric"
identification for future driver's licenses - - specifically
fingerprinting. Insist on a written response and forward their replies
to
me.
Second Action-to Take: Contact your state legislator and Senator's
office
to express strong disapproval of any program to force driver's to submit
to
biometric identification, particularly fingerprinting. Mention to your
legislator that in other states, driver's license fingerprint
requirements
have slipped through without the knowledge of elected officials. Get
their
position on this and extract a promise of vigilance from your state
representative.
Third Action-to-Take:
My special thanks to CYNDEE PARKER
of the National Coalition to Repeal the Fingerprint Law. Their hotline
is 404-250-8105
website address is: www.mcwebs.com/repeal/ or e-mail at
robertabob@mindspring.com.
--
RON
------------------
-They call 'em POLUTE-TICIANS because they POLUTE the MINDS
of OUR CHILDERN with their ANTI firearm RIGHTS SOCIALIST
political agendas. We of the older generations know B.S.
when we hear it.
-----------------------------------------------
In 2000, we must become politically active in
support of gun rights or we WILL LOSE the right
& the freedom.
-------------------------
NO FATE BUT WHAT WE MAKE!!!
----------------------
Every year,over 2 million Americans use firearms
not to take live but to preserve life,....limb & family
.Gun Control Democrats would prefer that they are all disarmed
and helpless and die victims of felony violence,instead.
Protect your gun rights, go to:
http://home.xnet.com/~gizmonic/TheMarch.html
and sign up as a helper or attendee or state organizer.
ernest2, Conn. CAN opp. "Do What You Can"!
http://thematrix.acmecity.com/digital/237/cansite/can.html
eGroups.
The best way to communicate by email in a group.
Start your own free email group! http://click.egroups.com/1/1885/4/_/444881/_/951476363/
-----
There is 1 message in this issue.
Topics in today's digest:
1. Re: I.D. for job $ driver's lic.
From: ron3817@webtv.net
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 15:32:44 -0500 (EST)
From: ron3817@webtv.net
Subject: Re: I.D. for job $ driver's lic.
What follows is one of the most disturbing stories I have ever done in
my
11 years as your editor. (American Sentinel). Please pay close attention
to
the information contained in this lead story. At its conclusion, I offer
an
effective "Action Plan" for each reader to take in their own state.
Buried
at approximately page 650 of a national defense bill (HR 3610, passed by
370 votes in the House of Representatives, September 28, 1996, each
states'
department of motor vehicles will require fingerprints (or other form of
"biometric" identification) as a condition of obtaining a driver's
license,
no later than October 1, 2000.
STATE FINGERPRINTING OF DRIVERS IS DIRECTED FROM WASHINGTON Universal
fingerprint program hidden from public view Road to Serfdom?
It's no accident that universal fingerprinting is being imposed by the
central authorities through state departments of motor vehicles (DMV).
(Backers of universal fingerprinting fear a national backlash, should
plans
for its implementation become public knowledge.) By making it appear
fingerprinting drivers is a state DMV decision, instead of a federal
mandate, the perpetrators this assault on the Constitution enjoy
enormous
political cover. Already, several states (Texas, Colorado, Georgia and
California) have implemented a requirement that all drivers submit
fingerprinting. In most cases, the above-mentioned state legislators are
complying with a federal fingerprint pilot program. Details on how this
came about and what it means to YOU follow: State DMV's are quietly
implementing federal fingerprint decree Section 656 of HR 3610 states
that "after October 1, 2000, Federal agencies
may only accept as proof of identity driver's licenses that conform to
the
standard developed by the Secretary of the Treasury," after consultation
with the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA).
Section 326 and 327 of the law provide $5 million per year to states
participating in any of the three federal pilot program requiring
"biometric" identification (i.e., confirmed through fingerprint, voice
analysis or retina pattern) of drivers. The AAMVA has repeatedly
testified
that it strongly favors the fingerprinting option. (Pull out and check
your
own driver's license; 22 states have quietly added a magnetic strip in
preparation to transmit YOUR "biometric" data to the national registry
now
being developed.)
Revealed: The perpetrators of this national fingerprint mandate
The last thing that the authors of the emerging national ID want is
debate
and discussion. It began on May 10, 1995, at a hearing held by the
Senate
Subcommittee on Immigration entitled "Verification of Applicant Identity
for the Purposes of Employment and Public Assistance." The hearing was
chaired by former Senator ALAN SIMPSON (R-WY) and attended by Senators
TEDDY KENNEDY (D-MA), DIANNE FEINSTEIN (D-CA) and JOHN KYLE (R-AZ). It
was
from this hearing that FEINSTEIN telegraphed federal intentions to
impose a
nation identity system. In remarks made on May 10, SIMPSON added: "I was
just saying to Ted (Kennedy) before he left, a hearing like
this fifteen years ago, would have torn the building down. And here we
are
today, kind of sitting around and no media, no nothing. This is fine
with
me. I get tired of them on this issue."
Federal fingerprint mandate is carefully camouflaged Section 656 of Hr
3610
mandating universal fingerprints which originally sprang from the
"Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act," signed by BILL
CLINTON in September 1996. Its provisions overlapped federal tracking
system to identify and deny employment to deadbeat dads. Enabling
legislation to provide a universal, federally accepted I.D. was rolled
into
the national defense bill, HR 3610 (roll call vote #455). In an
interview
with MICHAEL MYERS of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, he
acknowledged that now-departed SIMPSON staffer CHIP WOOD inserted
section
656, to create a federal fingerprint pilot program through state DMV's.
MYERS declined to identify the remaining staffers responsible for
slipping
section 656 into the defense appropriations bill.
Justice Department refuses to disclose details of fingerprint program My
research assistant SHANNON MUNZE made repeated calls to the Justice
Department, seeking details on the administration of the section 656
"Machine Readable Document Pilot (fingerprint) program." She spoke with
Justice attorney MICHAEL HUGHES, who acknowledged the existence of the
initiative, but informed us that any information concerning its
operational
details are not available to the Public (we're now proceeding on a FOIA
request).
If universal fingerprinting is such a good idea, why the deception? This
story was difficult to unearth because there is no one piece of
legislation declaring "we have a national I.D.!" First, the central
government is directing states to make all drivers' licenses "federally"
compatible, through biometric identification (i.e. fingerprints, etc.).
It's all to accommodate separate legislation requiring instant
background
checks on new employees in the private sector. (Some Republicans cheer
this
intrusion, because the new generation of federally-approved state
driver's
licenses will give Washington the power to enforce severe sanctions
against
deadbeat dads, tax cheats and other "undesirables.") These tamper-proof
IDs
will also be required to use credit cards and write checks (part of the
government's "antifraud" campaign). The upshot is this: Under new
immigration and "deadbeat dad" sanction laws. You will be denied
employment
without a federally-approved biometric driver's license after October 1,
2000! Not even the Nazis attained this kind of power. Why you must help
fight the national ID
In early test states such as Georgia, imposition of the central
government's fingerprint decree was so well camouflaged that local
activists were unable to mobilize against it in time. (Activists in
Alabama
thwarted the fingerprint scheme.) Here's what YOU can do to defeat this
threat to our liberties:
First-Action-to Take: Contact DMV. Ask the responsible official if your
state DMV has plans or is considering proposals to require "Biometric"
identification for future driver's licenses - - specifically
fingerprinting. Insist on a written response and forward their replies
to
me.
Second Action-to Take: Contact your state legislator and Senator's
office
to express strong disapproval of any program to force driver's to submit
to
biometric identification, particularly fingerprinting. Mention to your
legislator that in other states, driver's license fingerprint
requirements
have slipped through without the knowledge of elected officials. Get
their
position on this and extract a promise of vigilance from your state
representative.
Third Action-to-Take:
My special thanks to CYNDEE PARKER
of the National Coalition to Repeal the Fingerprint Law. Their hotline
is 404-250-8105
website address is: www.mcwebs.com/repeal/ or e-mail at
robertabob@mindspring.com.
--
RON
------------------
-They call 'em POLUTE-TICIANS because they POLUTE the MINDS
of OUR CHILDERN with their ANTI firearm RIGHTS SOCIALIST
political agendas. We of the older generations know B.S.
when we hear it.
-----------------------------------------------
In 2000, we must become politically active in
support of gun rights or we WILL LOSE the right
& the freedom.
-------------------------
NO FATE BUT WHAT WE MAKE!!!
----------------------
Every year,over 2 million Americans use firearms
not to take live but to preserve life,....limb & family
.Gun Control Democrats would prefer that they are all disarmed
and helpless and die victims of felony violence,instead.
Protect your gun rights, go to:
http://home.xnet.com/~gizmonic/TheMarch.html
and sign up as a helper or attendee or state organizer.
ernest2, Conn. CAN opp. "Do What You Can"!
http://thematrix.acmecity.com/digital/237/cansite/can.html