Loading a single round through the ejection port!

HighValleyRanch

New member
Load a new round through the ejection port with the magazine out and close the slide and then load your full magazine. How many of you do this?
 
I don't. It can be really hard on the extractor forcing it to snap over the
rim. Most handguns are designed to feed the cartridge under the extractor
from below. Load one from the magazine, drop the mag and load the
additional round into the magazine.
 
Yes, I was taught not to do that, and taught the same thing about the being hard on the extractor, but maybe that comes from the old school.
Supposedly, with many newer hinging extractors, it's not a big deal.
And this came up because although I rarely read my new gun instruction manuals, I was surprised that Beretta (manual for my new PX4 storm full size) gives it as one of two options. Load from the magazine as usual, or single load into the ejection port and then close the slide.

When thinking about this, doesn't the extractor slide over the cartridge rim every time anyways? Isn't it designed to hinge around the round as the slide closes?
And when we do malfunction drills, isn't this to pull out a stuck case using the extractor?
 
I never understood how manually placing a cartridge into a pistol barrel and then shutting the slide over it would cause damage to the extractor. I've had people tell me that manually operating a slide with no ammunition in it will damage the extractor or crack the bolt face or shatter the barrel lugs....

I had one guy arguing with himself it seemed like that placing a loaded magazine into the handgun and then slingshotting the slide would cause damage as his only correct way to load the auto pistol would be by applying pressure to the slide stop release and thereby chambering a round into the barrel.

This made even less sense to me being as if you look at the mode of operation this is exactly how an automatic pistol functions until it runs out of ammunition.


If somebody wants that I should handle their pistol some special type of way I'll put up with it while my hands are on their pistol.

They may get wide-eyed and start complaining seeing how I am with my pistols. This is not something I worry about generally as other peoples opinions of me are not my business.

I've never had a mechanical or parts failure with an automatic regardless of handling it any such type of way or not.

How does an extractor get damaged placing a cartridge into the chamber and allowing the slide to slam shut with the extractor claw popping over the extractor groove on the cartridge case? Isn't this how it is designed to operate- a spring loaded sharpened claw that pivots on a pin?
 
Manually loading a cartridge, and sending the slide into battery, into pistols such a M1911 with the traditional internal extractor is the quickest way to damage the extractor. On spring loaded (external) extractors, it doesn't do as much damage, but sure doesn't do them any favors. The cartridge rim should slip up behind the extractor claw. The extractor claw should not be forced to bounce over the cartridge rim.
 
Depends on the design.
I'll do it regularly with some designs, but avoid such with others.

Know the system, and use it accordingly.

1911, Ruger P-series, Browning BDA, and similar (stiff) spring extractors? It is best to feed from the magazine.
But Browning Hi Power, Browning Buckmark, Beretta 92, and similar pivoting extractors? I'll drop the slide on a chambered round without hesitation. Even if it does cause "undue stress", it is minimal and parts can be replaced.
 
highvalleyranch said:
Yes, I was taught not to do that, and taught the same thing about the being hard on the extractor, but maybe that comes from the old school.
Supposedly, with many newer hinging extractors, it's not a big deal.
With a fixed, spring steel extractor such as in the 1911, snapping the extractor over the case rim does stress the extractor unnecessarily and is not currently recommended. That said, the original Army field manual for the 1911 expressly offered that as a way to load a single round.

With the pivoted extractors, it doesn't hurt the firearm at all.

When thinking about this, doesn't the extractor slide over the cartridge rim every time anyways? Isn't it designed to hinge around the round as the slide closes?
No. At least in a 1911, the rim of the next round comes up from beneath the extractor and slides in behind the extractor hook as it comes up.
 
Yes, I was taught not to do that, and taught the same thing about the being hard on the extractor, but maybe that comes from the old school.
Supposedly, with many newer hinging extractors, it's not a big deal.
And this came up because although I rarely read my new gun instruction manuals, I was surprised that Beretta (manual for my new PX4 storm full size) gives it as one of two options. Load from the magazine as usual, or single load into the ejection port and then close the slide.

When thinking about this, doesn't the extractor slide over the cartridge rim every time anyways? Isn't it designed to hinge around the round as the slide closes?
And when we do malfunction drills, isn't this to pull out a stuck case using the extractor?
In many designs the cartridge slide up into the extractor rather than the extractor riding over the cartridge base.

The 1911 is a common example.
 
When thinking about this, doesn't the extractor slide over the cartridge rim every time anyways? Isn't it designed to hinge around the round as the slide closes?
And when we do malfunction drills, isn't this to pull out a stuck case using the extractor?

Yes, in most pistols, when fed from the magazine.

No, only certain designs are made to do that.

Yes, but the usual malfunction drill (tap, rack, bang) is for clearing a round that didn't fire, and may not clear a round that is actually stuck.

I've never had a mechanical or parts failure with an automatic regardless of handling it any such type of way or not.

Congratulations! I have had parts break without any mishandling, its something parts sometimes do.

How does an extractor get damaged placing a cartridge into the chamber and allowing the slide to slam shut with the extractor claw popping over the extractor groove on the cartridge case? Isn't this how it is designed to operate- a spring loaded sharpened claw that pivots on a pin?

Only if the gun is made that way. Some are, many are not. There are a LOT of designs where the extractor is not meant to pivot out, and there is no pin.

Some of the designs that do not have a pivoting extractor have the room (and the extractor tip contoured) so that they will slip out and snap over the case rim. Some do not.

Know the system, and use it accordingly.

This is 100% sound advice.

If the owner's manual says its ok to do it, then its ok to do it, and IF something fails, its the maker's responsibility to fix it. IF you do it, because someone who is not the maker says its ok, and something breaks, then its your responsibility to get it fixed.

With a fixed, spring steel extractor such as in the 1911, snapping the extractor over the case rim does stress the extractor unnecessarily and is not currently recommended. That said, the original Army field manual for the 1911 expressly offered that as a way to load a single round.

The Army told me a LOT of things that while they would work, were not the best practice. :D

Consider these points,
A pivoting extractor doesn't bend, the entire thing moves, so low/no stress on the part in a manner it wasn't made to handle.

The internal extractor (1911 style) isn't made to be bent outwards and snap back as its normal method of operation. Most of them will survive that when done occasionally, but if done regularly, you're stressing the part in a manner it was not meant to be stressed. Sometimes the part will never break. Sometimes it will break, eventually, and sometimes it can break sooner than later.

Extractors rarely give you any advance warning, and if one fails due to metal fatigue resulting from being bent/battered because of the way someone used it, it can be anytime with no warning at all. This can be an annoyance on the range or it could be a deadly serious failure.

If the claw breaks off during a gunfight, (rare but not impossible) its a deadly serious failure.

Extractors can fail when the stars line up just right, even when you only use them in the approved manner. New gun, you go to the maker, used gun, you're on your own. I once got a used .45, gun looked brand new, showed no signs of misuse, and the extractor hook sheared off on the third magazine it ran through it. Bad part? perhaps, Murphy in action? possibly. Can't say with certainty why it happened, only that it did.

I have a pistol (a rare one) where the owners manual specifically warns NEVER drop the bolt on a chambered round. It has a pivoting extractor, BUT that gun could slamfire if you do that. Most guns aren't like that, but some are.
 
I was surprised that Beretta (manual for my new PX4 storm full size) gives it as one of two options. Load from the magazine as usual, or single load into the ejection port and then close the slide.
As others have said, it depends on the design. If the manual doesn't explicitly allow for direct-chamber loading (dropping a round in and dropping the slide), it's best to load only from the magazine.

A couple of Beretta designs (including the Beretta 92/96 series) allow it and the Ruger P85/P89 manual also explicitly states it is an approved procedure.

Some designs are not designed to tolerate it and can be damaged by direct-chamber loading. Glock does not allow it and if you poke around, you can find people who have chipped/damaged their extractor by direct-chamber loading Glocks.

It's very much like dry-firing.

1. If the manufacturer says it's ok, then go for it. If not, do it at your own risk.
2. Even if the manufacturer says it's ok, it may not be something you want to do to excess.
 
Most extractors move-either by being hinged or being made in a manner that allows them to flex.
TMK, I have never seen a gun with a fixed extractor-though there may be some.

The specific reason that extractors move is so they CAN slip over the rim of a chambered round. Doing so should not cause undue wear on the part.

A 1911-type extractor simply can not be over stressed, because it's contained in the slide. The extractor is actually a spring in itself.
 
Last edited:
The 1911 was designed as a controlled round feed. Normally, there is only the small amount of flex to provide the desired extractor tension. The magazine spring provides most of the force to push the cartridge head up the breech face under the extractor hook. The extractor is not designed to deflect outward enough to snap over the rim. I hear you,yes indeed. It WILL do it. And in a life and death emergency, go for it.

The extractor on a 1911 fits in a drilled hole. There is not a lot of flex room. There is a pad on the outside surface of the exactor to limit travel. Its not far behind the hook.When the extractor is over flexed, that pad is the fulcrum, bending takes place in the hook itself the thinnest section. Where there are inside corners, stress risers.
As the bend takes place over a relatively short distance,the flex is excessive.

One job your pistolsmith will strive to get just right is extractor tension.

It holds the cartridge to the breech face during cycling,This is particularly important during extraction and ejection. The blade ejector will be erratic if the slide/extractor is dropping the brass.
Improper extractor tension is the root cause of many 1911 malfunctions.

The advice to NOT snapover the extractor on controlled round firearms is sound.

The retort " I do it all the time and nothing has broke" is based in ignorance and a lack of understanding how a 1911 works.

Then there is the attitude. " If I don't understand it,it must not be true"

A lack of understanding has nothing to do with whether or not something is true.
 
TMK, I have never seen a gun with a fixed extractor-though there may be some.

You've seen hundreds if not thousands of pictures of guns with "fixed" extractors, without realizing it. :D

Can't think of any rifles or handguns using that system, but the Browing machine guns do, sort of. Few people know the insides of them, but I do.

There is a part called the extractor, but it extracts rounds from the belt. What functions to extract rounds from the chamber is a "T slot" in the bolt face. That as "fixed" as it gets, in my opinion. :D

The classic Mauser claw on their bolt actions is able to flex enough to snap over a case rim IF there is enough clearance in the action, and not all were made with that clearance. Without the clearance, you can break the claw trying to force it over a chambered case rim.

The 1903 Springfield is made to chamber load single rounds.

With pistols, particularly the 1911 type, there can be quite a bit of variance in the slope of the extractor nose (different makers, etc) and some guns extractors aren't cut to easily allow them to snap over the rim of a chambered round. Its a simple fix, but if its not there, then the extractor takes more force rearwards before it flexes out, and I don't see how that would be a good thing for the life of the part, long term.
 
The specific reason that extractors move is so they CAN slip over the rim of a chambered round.
That is one reason they move in some designs. Two other reasons are to hold the case in place firmly during the last part of feeding and extraction and to release the empty cartridge more easily on extraction.
A 1911-type extractor simply can not be over stressed, because it's contained in the slide. The extractor is actually a spring in itself.
A common problem with direct chamber feeding in guns that are not designed for it is chipping or breaking of the extractor. In some guns, the extractor is a relatively hard part with a separate spring and it doesn't take well to repeated impacts on the extractor hook from the front.

As far as the 1911 goes, I think your comment could be correct in the ideal case. It's unfortunate that so often things in the real world are not ideal.
 
44 AMP said:
With pistols, particularly the 1911 type, there can be quite a bit of variance in the slope of the extractor nose (different makers, etc) and some guns extractors aren't cut to easily allow them to snap over the rim of a chambered round. Its a simple fix, but if its not there, then the extractor takes more force rearwards before it flexes out, and I don't see how that would be a good thing for the life of the part, long term.
Further, the original M1911 extractor was specified to be made from spring steel. With the exception of the extractors from Cylinder and Slide, today's 1911 extractors are either "tool steel" or MIM. Neither has sufficient flexibility to stand up to repeated over-flexing as caused by snapping the extractor hook over the case rim. You may get away with it once, or even multiple times, but eventually it will probably either break the extractor, or de-tension it.
 
I always load from the magazine then top off the mag. I figure it like this, it can’t hurt doing it this way and it’s not a big deal to do it.
 
Back
Top