Hey, so I got to thinking. What are the common load development methods and how well do they work? One of the things I have sort of figured out over the years is that the method or techniques in the method need to produce results every time. Based on Hornady's podcast on dispersion and not shooting enough round to get reliable data.
Currently, I test to max to ensure no pressure signs. Then work down to find a stable velocity, then tune seating depth for group size. so far it has worked every time
I know of other methods with tuning the powder charge for group size shooting groups for the smallest group. This method has seemed to work ok, but seems to sacrifice velocity if the accurate node if further down.
As well as some of the quick workup types that rely on powder changes for point of impact shifts. I just dont see how these can work reliably as there is not enough data.
What methods have you tried? and what has been consistent and reliable to produce results every time? do you take into consideration how many round you use up during load development?
Currently, I test to max to ensure no pressure signs. Then work down to find a stable velocity, then tune seating depth for group size. so far it has worked every time
I know of other methods with tuning the powder charge for group size shooting groups for the smallest group. This method has seemed to work ok, but seems to sacrifice velocity if the accurate node if further down.
As well as some of the quick workup types that rely on powder changes for point of impact shifts. I just dont see how these can work reliably as there is not enough data.
What methods have you tried? and what has been consistent and reliable to produce results every time? do you take into consideration how many round you use up during load development?