The AA load data on their website does not suggest an OAL
It shows their tested OAL was 1.237"
Their tested RN is a Berry's, which is kind of a blunt RN, so the shorter OAL only surprises me a little. They also show a Sierra FMJ (which is usually a RN in the 45 ACP world) at 1.250" - longer, but still shorter than I would expect.
No, the OAL for a 230 gr RN is not necessarily the same as it is for a 200 gr SWC. Most reloading manuals say it should be 1.260 to 1.275. It may depend on the pistol you're firing them in.
I agree. I load 200 SWC's to 1.240" and Berry's RN's to 1.265." Now Berry's RN's are kind of rounded (as previously mentioned). I may load a more pointy ogive closer to 1.275."
SWC/RN = Apples/Oranges.
I don't mean to post a contradiction. Handloading is full of varying data. This is one of those times. Point is, RN bullet profiles are
generally loaded to a longer OAL than an SWC profile. But it's certainly not etched in stone. A plunk test is really the best way to determine OAL - regardless of profile.
I like AA#2 BTW. So I looked in my load data for 45 ACP and haven't ever used it, surprisingly. Well, not too surprising because W231 is so pleasing with 45 ACP, it's hard to beat 32 years of loading the combination. No need to experiment when you've already got it right.
I digress.
AA#2 is really good stuff. Yes, I like it a lot in 9mm too. Meters second to none. Runs clean and extremely consistent - all the things you mentioned. And has just the right burn rate for your application. I have no doubt you'll put together the right combination to make some great shooters.