lever gun, accuracy expectations?

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Shadow9mm

New member
So I know there are a number of factors involved. With that said, with modern steel, and modern manufacturing techniques, and a good hand load, what kind of accuracy should I expect? I have a newer production steel side gate Henry in 44mag/spl with a 20in barrel with a 1:20 twist (yes I checked it is 1:20)

I went into this with the expectation of being able to achieve 2moa with good loads.

My loads have been around 4moa with hornady XTP bullets. I am working with some cast bullets as well, but I am having some stability issues, which I think I have worked out, but I have not had a chance to test yet.

Is my expectation of 2moa realistic? If not what should I expect from a modern production lever gun?


I also managed to shoot one 3 shot group at right about 1moa at 50yds with a friend loads. I am chalking it up to a fluke right now, but I plan to duplicate his load and see if I can repeat the results.

attachment.php
 
Last edited:
Lever rifle and MOA should never be allowed in the same sentence. Oops, I just did it.

Really, most people don't buy a lever rifle with target shooting in mind. Rimfire levers are great for plinking and most centerfire levers are bought for hunting or home defense. Still, accuracy is important in any such scenario and there's nothing wrong with trying to wring the best out of the rifle and shooter.
 
Nothing wrong with what you’re doing. When it comes to lever guns as long as it piles up when I hit it I’m happy.

It would be interesting though to see if your rifle does well again when you test out your friends load. Maybe your particular rifle likes it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
I've got that same rifle but in .45 Colt and with Skinner peep sights. I've never really measured group size but I can say that there are loads that shoot decent and loads that shoot really, really badly, nothing really in between.

Any idea what was different about your friend's loads from yours? Makes me kind of curious.
 
Around 2-4 MOA is pretty typical for lever guns in pistol calibers. Those chambered in rifle cartridges will often shoot 1 MOA. But around 2 MOA is probably more common.
 
Around 2-4 MOA is pretty typical for lever guns in pistol calibers
Click to expand...
Agreed. Lever actions in general are about 3 MOA rifles, pistol alibers or bottleneck. That is partly due to the limitations of hanging everything on the barrel and harmonics changing as cartridges are removed from the magazine with each shot, partly due to the sights lever actions are supplied with, and in large part due to the quality of barrels used on entry-level rifles.
 
paknheat said:
Nothing wrong with what you’re doing. When it comes to lever guns as long as it piles up when I hit it I’m happy.

It would be interesting though to see if your rifle does well again when you test out your friends load. Maybe your particular rifle likes it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Click to expand...
There are a couple differences between his and mine. both loads are 44spl with 280g wide flat nose bullets.

First is powder, he is using H110 where I am using Power Pistol

Second is velocity, I was at about 1055, trying to stay subsonic. His loads are in the 1300fps range if I remember correctly.

Lastly is pressure. His loads are around 20k PSI per GRT, my loads, per GRT were in the 13k PSI range.

Both our rifles are Henrys, although his has a brass receiver and mine is steel.

I slugged my barrel and came up with .430, which is what we have been sizing out bullets to. I am suspicious that his extra pressure is causing the bullets to seal better and keeping them stable. I will be doing some duplication if his loads to test. As well as pushing my loads up a bit to the 20k pressure range to see if mine start shooting straight. I also ordered sizers in .431 and .432. going to see if going up in bullet size will fix my problem as well with the lower pressure loads. kind of just double checking my theory.
 
I would use magnum cases, shorter jump to the lands. And H110, W296, or 4227 for powder, especially in a rifle where the slower burning powder is more efficient.
 
I just sold my JM marlins straight case calibers. I had a late 60s 1894sr 44mg. At 50yds it would clover leaf all day. 240 XTP / 22.5 gr H-2400. It out shot Ruger #3 and original
Ruger 44 Carbine. I though it was best you could get until I sighted in a pair of Ruger 77/44s with Leupold 2x7 scopes and Win White Box 240gr JSP. They shot clover leafs a 100yds.
When shooting my Marlin 1894 for group I used K4 scope. I ran a Lyman 66 receiver sight for deer hunting.
 
44caliberkid said:
I would use magnum cases, shorter jump to the lands. And H110, W296, or 4227 for powder, especially in a rifle where the slower burning powder is more efficient.
Click to expand...
Went with 44spl and power pistol for a couple reasons. the 284g bullets I am shooting were intended for 44spl cases. loaded they are as long as standard 44 mag and will not fit in the gun. The other bullets will fit in a 44mag case.

With that said I have about 1800 large pistol primers, and only about 250 large pistol magnums. So while I love H110, I only have a few primers for it and have not been able to find more at this point. and my power pistol loads have been exceptionally consistent.

CAUTION: The following post (or a page linked to) includes or discusses loading data not covered by currently published sources of tested data for this cartridge (QuickLOAD or Gordon's Reloading Tool data is not professionally tested). USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. Neither the writer, The Firing Line, nor the staff of TFL assumes any liability for any damage or injury resulting from the use of this information.

Data worked up using GRT and quick load

starline brass
CCI large pistol primers
284g home cast, NOE mold Wide flat nose, powder coated, gas checked
Power Pistol powder

6 shots each over the chrono at 15ft, 82F

7.4g, Avg 1032fps, SD 11.25, ES 33
7.5g, Avg, 1046fps, SD 4.46, ES 10
7.6g, Avg 1058fps, SD 7.76, ES 21

Based on my research and a touch of testing I can go up to around 12.0g of Power pistol with this bullet and stay under 35k psi. I did thrown 1 round over the chrono at 10.0g a while back and it was in the 1300fps range, similar to my friends loads. I calculated that 9.5g should give me about 21k psi, right around where his loads are at and shooting well. so I plan to test that and see if they shoot straight with the higher pressure without too much blast.
 
stagpanther said:
I've had a few with low-density loads in 44 mag.
Click to expand...
The 44spl cases are reasonably full. everything has played nice so far.

in 44 mag casings, they have been full charges of h110. I did some testing with AA #7, got some low ish velocities 1500fps with a 240g at max, but good SD and ES and everything lit up just fine.
 
In my limited experience, Henry BBS in .41 and .357, shooting off the bench with bags and iron sights I’m usually under 3” at 50yds and 5” at 100 yds shooting 10 rounds per target. I’m sure I could tighten that up with a scope but just want to retain an authentic look. Shooting off hand you can double those sizes. I feel this is pretty good and am happy with this performance.
 
May be apples to oranges but I have a 336 in 35 REM that will do 1-1/4 at 100 yds. I had a 4x12 Nikon on it at the time shooting a home cast 200RNFP. I like traditional sights on a lever gun so the scope came off and accuracy dropped to 5 at 100. Nowhere does buckhorn sights fit in an accuracy equation.
 
You might be able to get to 1 MOA with a lot of work, single loading and a good sighting system. Mine are all in the 2-4 MOA range with a little bit of work.
 
I wouldn’t keep a rifle if it didn’t have practical accuracy. Any rifle I keep has to do a inch at 50yds with irons if I’ve got no scope option. Many of my older classic deer rifles are original and I won’t D&T them for scopes. With scope rifles better be in 1” class or they are just temporary boarders. I’m not one to put money in a gun to make it shoot. I do try to work up loads for individual rifles. That’s it, not bedding, floating, re this or that.
Some gun scribe once said the only accurate rifles are interesting, this is true. I can’t tell you how many rifles I’ve owned, into hundreds. The 1st new rifle I bought was a Rem 742 in about 1966. I had to have one because that’s what all the older guys had. My 1st purchase turned out to be one of worst rifles I ever bought. It was a 3” gun and nothing improved it.
You can’t expect levers, pumps and autos to be tack driving target guns but without practical
degree of accuracy they are worthless. Many say 6” at 100yds is a good hunting rifle. I say it’s a insult to call it a rifle.
 
Shadow9mm said:
There are a couple differences between his and mine. both loads are 44spl with 280g wide flat nose bullets.

First is powder, he is using H110 where I am using Power Pistol

Second is velocity, I was at about 1055, trying to stay subsonic. His loads are in the 1300fps range if I remember correctly.

Lastly is pressure. His loads are around 20k PSI per GRT, my loads, per GRT were in the 13k PSI range.

Both our rifles are Henrys, although his has a brass receiver and mine is steel.

I slugged my barrel and came up with .430, which is what we have been sizing out bullets to. I am suspicious that his extra pressure is causing the bullets to seal better and keeping them stable. I will be doing some duplication if his loads to test. As well as pushing my loads up a bit to the 20k pressure range to see if mine start shooting straight. I also ordered sizers in .431 and .432. going to see if going up in bullet size will fix my problem as well with the lower pressure loads. kind of just double checking my theory.
Click to expand...
Would ask what specific bullets you and friend are using? In a shorter case it may not be the col that matters, but what the jump is from the bullets full diam to the rifling. Believe your choice of 44 special cases and lower pressure may be making the difference. Especially when considering the results of shooting your friends loads, which do not look like a fluke to me.
 
zeke said:
Would ask what specific bullets you and friend are using? In a shorter case it may not be the col that matters, but what the jump is from the bullets full diam to the rifling. Believe your choice of 44 special cases and lower pressure may be making the difference. Especially when considering the results of shooting your friends loads, which do not look like a fluke to me.
Click to expand...
We are using home cast bullets. We are both using a 284g wide flat nose from a noe mold that is 44spl specific. I also used a 200 round flat lee mold. His bullets are going straight, mine, both types, are yawing and tumbling. Same bullet alloy, and all sized to .430. He is using h110 where i am using power pistol. But based on the load data, his are around 20k psi, where mine are around 14k.

After buying a micrometer looks like our bullets are under sized by .0012. So i suspect his extra pressure is making the bullets bump up in size to seal the barrel, where mine probably has gas cutting. Making them unstable.

But this is just a guess. I loaded my loads up to match his 20k psi to see if that fixes it. I also ordered a .432 sizer and will be testing my lower power loads again to kind of cross check.

Im hoping to test mon/tues. Duplicated my friend load. And loaded mine at the higher pressure. Gonna shoot 25, 50, and 100yds. Make sure they are all shooting straight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top