Wildalaska
Moderator
Most progressive states have some form or another of Castle Doctrines, which eliminate the Legal Duty to Retreat in ones home, and frequently a place of business.
Many other jurisdictions have extended that Doctrine into Stand your ground laws applicable to areas outside the home.
There fore, the armed citizen, under these laws, has no legal duty to retreat, even if he can do so in complete safety.
But does he have a moral/ehtical duty to do so? I postulate that the responsible armed citizen does. Vote and discuss.
Please note: The poll question is: Retreat with COMPLETE SAFETY
WilditscloudytodayinAlaska ™
Many other jurisdictions have extended that Doctrine into Stand your ground laws applicable to areas outside the home.
There fore, the armed citizen, under these laws, has no legal duty to retreat, even if he can do so in complete safety.
But does he have a moral/ehtical duty to do so? I postulate that the responsible armed citizen does. Vote and discuss.
Please note: The poll question is: Retreat with COMPLETE SAFETY
WilditscloudytodayinAlaska ™