I don't hunt any longer.
So all my handguns will have lead based bullets in them.
If I were to hunt here in California,
Either I would avoid hunting in the so-called "Condor zones"
or use all-copper ammo like Cor-Bon DPX for hunting.
Given that I don't hunt though,
I can still legally carry lead in the Condor zones.
The entire lead issue is well over-blown.
Considering the amount of lead bullets and shot expended over the last 225 years, versus how little (in comparison) is expended today in hunting, if lead were to be a significant problem for the Condor (or other animals) we would have seen them die off around 1910-1930 instead.
This is becoming a crusade, not for public benefit, but to benefit the crusaders so they can point to "progress" against something. It's the same with auto pollution. Today's automobiles -- all the cars in the state combined -- put out less engine pollution than the 604,000 cars in California when the first state highways were paved. Yet the crusaders want even tighter emissions restrictions.
The same applies here. The "science" involved in the lead issue is sketchey at best. The so-called "micro dust" of lead found in game meat shot with lead bullets has been around since the first guns were used.
Since the Condor is a carriorn eater the appropriate tactic would require hunters to gut their animals to remove lead bullets and/or sack the gutpiles for removal. This would greatly reduce lead exposure in varmint animals killed by sportsmen without having to ban lead shot or bullets.