Law enforcement agencies' purchases to favor companies that make safer guns

glockguy45

New member
http://www.sunspot.net/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer ?section=news&pagename=story&storyid=1150300203104]Source


Law enforcement agencies' purchases to favor companies that make safer guns
29 U.S. cities and counties form gun-safety coalition, note Smith & Wesson deal
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Associated Press
WASHINGTON -- Maintaining pressure on gun manufacturers, the Clinton administration announced that 29 cities and counties will give preference to gun makers that follow the lead of Smith & Wesson -- producing safer firearms and adopting a code of responsible conduct.

"Government at every level should use their procurement policies to support manufacturers who take responsible steps to make guns safer and to keep guns out of the wrong hands," said Andrew M. Cuomo, secretary of housing and urban development, who announced the new gun-safety coalition.

Cuomo urged communities of every size to join the effort and said preferential buying can force the gun industry to fall in line behind the Smith & Wesson agreement because sales to law enforcement agencies represent 20 percent to 30 percent of the U.S. gun market.

"It's common sense from police to buy guns from a company that makes it harder for criminals to get hold of guns that can be used against police and civilians," Cuomo said.

Last week, Smith & Wesson, the largest U.S. manufacturer of handguns, agreed to quickly install gun locks on all the weapons it sells, to introduce "smart gun" technology permitting weapons to be fired only by their owners and to block gun sales at gun shows without a background check.

The company broke industry ranks and changed its policy in exchange for a promise that a lawsuit against it would be dropped.

Two gun makers -- Glock Inc. and Browning -- have announced that they will not sign voluntary gun-safety agreements similar to the one agreed to by Smith & Wesson Corp.

Cuomo said yesterday's announcement was an undisguised attempt to keep the pressure on those and other gun makers.

"Consumers want a safer America," Cuomo said. "Because of Smith & Wesson's agreement, we now know a safer America is possible. And we demand it."

Joining the coalition were the attorneys general of Connecticut, Maryland and New York, and mayors or county officials in California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Rhode Island, Texas and Wisconsin.

The list included Los Angeles, San Francisco, Atlanta, St. Louis, New Orleans, Boston and Florida's Miami-Dade County.

"We have the capacity to squeeze manufacturers like a pincers and hurt them in the marketplace," said Attorney General Elliot Spitz of New York. "We are bigger than the NRA."

The National Rifle Association has been harshly critical of gun initiatives in general. NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre discounted the importance of the Smith & Wesson deal, saying there was not much new in it.

Mayor Bill Campbell of Atlanta said he had just attended the funeral of Fulton County Deputy Sheriff Ricky Kinchen, a shooting victim.

"Atlanta buys about a million dollars [worth] of guns each year," the mayor said.

When the purchasing power of other cities is added, the gun manufacturers "will comply or they will cease operations," he said.

Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a New York Democrat, applauded the effort and said he will soon introduce legislation to instruct federal law enforcement agencies who buy guns to give preference "to those manufacturers who sign on to the Smith & Wesson agreement."

Schumer said he will offer similar legislation dealing with gun purchases by the police force that protects the Capitol.

"I think we are seeing a real sea change here in how America regards guns," Schumer said. "And now there is a chance in America to do something about guns."


Originally published on Mar 23 2000

_______________________________________________

And they think its ok to make other companies go belly up because they don't want to play by THEIR rules


------------------
I am more than happy to turn my gun's in, Bullets first

(Edited to fix formatting problem-TBM)

[This message has been edited by TheBluesMan (edited March 23, 2000).]
 
I ain't over yet. There are a labyrinth of state, federal, and local procurement policies dictating these purchases. In addition to police unions etc who may fight having the type of weapon they carry dictated to them for political reasons. Let's encourage every LEO we meet to fight this.

Excerpt of Story from USA Today:
Police urged to buy from safer gunmakers
HUD, local officials seek support for higher
standards
http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20000323/2062222s.htm

By Gary Fields
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON -- Led by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, officials from 29 cities and counties said they'll push
their law enforcement agencies to buy guns from manufacturers who
agree to higher safety standards...The agreement expands on a pact reached last week by HUD Secretary
Andrew Cuomo and the mayors of Atlanta, Detroit and Miami. It is
intended to pressure other gunmakers to join Smith & Wesson in
agreeing to increase gun safety, Cuomo said.

Cuomo said law enforcement agencies buy 30% of guns sold in the USA.
''Why wouldn't we want to patronize the company that is doing the most
(it) can to keep guns out of the hands of criminals in the first place?''
he asked...New York Attorney General Elliot Spitzer said Wednesday's action is
about economics. ''We have the capacity to squeeze them like a pincer
and say we will deny them their most important market,'' he said.

Several U.S. Justice and Treasury Department officials said that could
be difficult because of federal procurement laws and because the
safety of the officers and agents who use the weapons is the top
concern.


Three manufacturers provide the primary weapons for the FBI, Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Secret Service, Customs and Drug
Enforcement Administration. They are Beretta U.S.A., SIG Arms and
Sturm, Ruger & Co.

[ Covert note: FBI issues Glocks now and Sigs, Customs issues Glocks, Border Patrol issues Rugers, Berettas, and Glock, i think, DEA issues Sigs or did, IRS issues Sigs and ? Beretta is favored by local and state police agencies.... the ones that don't use Glock]

''Most departments bought new semiautomatics within the last 10
years, and new purchasing is incremental,'' said Jeff Reh, Beretta
U.S.A.'s general counsel.

James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, said,
''What it sounds like they are saying is instead of equipping our
officers with the best-quality weapons available, we're going to equip
our officers with weapons from manufacturers who agree with us
politically.''



Link to Wash Post story:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63325-2000Mar22.html

In the story, a senior Treasury Dept official said this wouldn't be simple to accomplish, and they're not immediately in favor. He said they want to insure that their agents have the best tools they can get. Not many of them issue S&W's by the way. Mostly Glocks, Sigs, and some HK's, i think.


[This message has been edited by Covert Mission (edited March 23, 2000).]

[This message has been edited by Covert Mission (edited March 23, 2000).]
 
Back
Top