Did anyone besides me see the 4/5/99 episode of LAW AND ORDER? At the end of the show Sam Waterstons comment was to the effect that more cities should sue the gun companies to put them out of business. I think I have that right. When I heard "sue the gun companies",I got so damn mad I missed the rest of what he said. Just more reconstituted bull fodder from NBC.
Law and Order-or the media strikes again
- Thread starter Paul B.
- Start date
Paul..
You heard right. Over the last year, L&W has taken a direct shot at at least 3 amendments in the Bill of Rights and cast aspersions at others.
I used to like that show, but this past year I've noticed it more and more promoting a totalitarian governmental stance...for our own good of course
------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes"
You heard right. Over the last year, L&W has taken a direct shot at at least 3 amendments in the Bill of Rights and cast aspersions at others.
I used to like that show, but this past year I've noticed it more and more promoting a totalitarian governmental stance...for our own good of course
------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes"
Sam Waterston has come out on the anti gun side a number of times. I suspect that as one of the better established characters on the show, he is given free run to inject his own slant on the story line. He has ruined not only a good number of L&O episodes, but a few History Channel shorts also.
------------------
A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined;
George Washington Jan 8,1790--There can be no doubt about the Second Amendment.
------------------
A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined;
George Washington Jan 8,1790--There can be no doubt about the Second Amendment.