Last Brief Filed In SCOTUS Carry Case Is A Thing Of Beauty

[BornFighting88]

Yes, this is what I was under the impression of, too. The case was arguing the legitimacy of “May issue” permit schemes, and paving the way for making “shall issue” the next step.

Maybe even keep moving along and start going from “shall issue” to constitutional carry.

 

[Metal god]

The Court seeks to focus on the justification (may issue) provision of the law, nothing more.

Hmm so what you're saying is ( Cathy Newman ) when the court said they will narrowly look at this case and that narrowing will only focus on conceal carry . What they really meant was , we will only focus on the "may issue" aspect ?? That doesn't make sense , why not just say we are looking at the may issue only ?

I've been doing some minor research on this case and most info is on the SCOTUS case and not any of the prior lower court filings . So far the one thing that gives me some hope is that NY pretty much does not allow open carry . Maybe the SC narrowed the case to concealed because that's the only way NY allows carry outside the home unless hunting or other obvious reasons one would be open carrying .

 

[TruthTellers]

Yes, this is what I was under the impression of, too. The case was arguing the legitimacy of “May issue” permit schemes, and paving the way for making “shall issue” the next step.

Maybe even keep moving along and start going from “shall issue” to constitutional carry.

The alternative possibility is since it's mostly anti gun states that do the May Issue carry is they could go to No Issue.

 

[Aguila Blanca]

The alternative possibility is since it's mostly anti gun states that do the May Issue carry is they could go to No Issue.

That's a very remote possibility, since it would be virtually impossible for a majority of the current SCOTUS to reconcile "No Issue" with the Constitution.

It's all speculation. Why don't we wait for the ruling and see what the court says?