• Anything ‘published’ on the web is viewed as intellectual property and, regardless of whether it displays a copyright symbol or not, is therefore copyrighted by the originator. The only exception to this is if there is a “free and unrestricted reuse” statement associated with the work.

    In order to protect our members and TFL from possible litigation, all members must abide by the following new rules:

    1. Copying and pasting entire articles from another site to TFL is strictly prohibited. The same applies to articles from print or other media, and to posting photographs taken of copyrighted pages or other media.

    2. Copyright law provides for “fair use” of portions of a copyrighted work. You can copy no more than a SINGLE paragraph from the article to your post (3 or 4 sentences at most).

    3. You must provide a link to the article along with the name of website. For example: ww.xxx.yyy/zzz (The Lower Thumbsuck Daily News).

    4. You must provide, in your own words, a brief summary of the article AND your reasons for believing it will be of interest to TFL members. Failure to do so may result in the thread being closed or your post being deleted as a “cut and paste drive by.”

    5. Photographs and other images are also copyrighted. "Hotlinking" of images (so that it appears in your message) from other sites is also prohibited unless you own rights to the image. If you wish to share an image, provide a clickable link to it.

    Posts that do not follow these new guidelines will be altered or deleted by staff. Members who continue to violate this policy may lose their posting privileges at TFL.

    Thank you for your cooperation and your participation in TFL, the leading online forum for firearms enthusiasts.

Kinda interesting - the $$ value of TFL

Interesting....

When I typed in thefiringline.com the result was $125.00. Yet type in www.thefiringline.com and you get $95,624.00.

The first address is the correct address....

thehighroad.org = $219.00
www.thehighroad.org = $87,743.00

Similar results for all websites that do not use a "www" in their address!
 
Antipitas, that's not really true. There's nothing "correct" about thefiringline.com vs www.thefiringline.com

There's nothing special about a "www." prefix, either. It's just customary for Foo, inc. to have its website accessible at both "foo.com" and "www.foo.com"

It looks like that site is judging the value of a website based on the number of links to that site from elsewhere on the web. Those numbers mean that many more people link to "www.thefiringline.com" than link to "thefiringline.com"
 
Tyme, while I think that you are probably correct for the most part, there are quite a number of places that you won't get to, if preceeded by a "www." Conversely, lack of.

I suggest trying the Library of Congress with a "www" preceeding it....
 
Oh, I see what you're getting at. I was describing only second-level domains like foo.com, not lower-level domains like foo.bar.com (www.foo.bar.com quite often will not work).

People and companies usually register second-level domains like foo.com or foo.org. For those domains, the main website will usually be at both www.foo.com and foo.com, www.foo.org and foo.org.

When you add levels to the domain, all bets are off. Something like research.att.com might have www.research.att.com (it does), but something like thomas.loc.gov probably won't have a corresponding www.thomas.loc.gov.

It's all up to the people who register the domains what to do with them. There are plenty of domains (not catering to visitors) that have no websites, either at foo.com or www.foo.com or bar.foo.com or www.bar.foo.com.
 
Back
Top