I was thinking of getting one of these smaller pistols for concealed carry, and I have a few questions.
1) Is the recoil substantially stronger in the .40 caliber? Enough to make you wish you were shooting a 9 mm?
2) Is there a significant difference in stopping power? Enough to go with the .40 S&W?
3) Is it a lot more expensive to shoot the .40 caliber? I have a pistol in 9mm and sort of was leaning toward the .40 since it's a caliber I don't own; but if .40 S&W ammo is considerably more expensive, I might just go with the 9 mm. I can get Winchester white box for $6 a box in 9 mm.
4) Is $240 a good price for a new Kel-Tec?
5) What are your experiences with these handguns? Does Kel-Tec treat their customers right?
1) Is the recoil substantially stronger in the .40 caliber? Enough to make you wish you were shooting a 9 mm?
2) Is there a significant difference in stopping power? Enough to go with the .40 S&W?
3) Is it a lot more expensive to shoot the .40 caliber? I have a pistol in 9mm and sort of was leaning toward the .40 since it's a caliber I don't own; but if .40 S&W ammo is considerably more expensive, I might just go with the 9 mm. I can get Winchester white box for $6 a box in 9 mm.
4) Is $240 a good price for a new Kel-Tec?
5) What are your experiences with these handguns? Does Kel-Tec treat their customers right?