I have a Kel-tec P40 I bought to carry hiking and backpacking. I would have preferred a slightly larger 10MM in a traditional double action, but no such thing exists (Glock 29 was a close runner-up). Anyway, I've never been able to get the P40 to work reliably. I've tried a variety of ammo, bullet weights, etc. I've polished the feed ramp (most problems occur because the bullet nose jams on the feed ramp). Now I see Kel-tec has discontinued the P40s due to the frequent problems. Anyway, I'm thinking that maybe I should try a .357 Sig barrel in it. That should still give better power and penetration than a 9mm, but maybe feed more reliably than the .40 S&W.
Anyone have experience with a Kel-tec in .357 Sig? My goal is to have a light weight, compact handgun that would still have a decent chance of penetrating the skull of a black bear or killing a mountain lion in the unlikely event that this were necessary. I know bigger, heavier guns would be better for this purpose, but I insist on very light and compact. Thanks.
Doug
Anyone have experience with a Kel-tec in .357 Sig? My goal is to have a light weight, compact handgun that would still have a decent chance of penetrating the skull of a black bear or killing a mountain lion in the unlikely event that this were necessary. I know bigger, heavier guns would be better for this purpose, but I insist on very light and compact. Thanks.
Doug