I'm saving my pennies for an MK40 but I keep seeing K40 coverts on gunbroker and other places for real good prices (there's a K40 covert on GB for $400 right now).
It looks to me like the K40 covert is just a regular K40 with the grip cut down to the same size as the MK40.
I'm thinking that the reason that the MK40 is so concealable is the shorter grip (the grip is the part of my Steyr M40 that prints, but not the slide).
If the shorter slide of the MK doesn't increase concealability all that much then maybe there is an advantage to the full length slide of the K40 covert (longer barrel and longer sight radius should make for a more accurate gun).
Anyone of you guys out there fired both?
I'm wondering if I should just go ahead and get the less expensive K40 covert. (although I gotta admit the MK is just better looking then the K covert )
It looks to me like the K40 covert is just a regular K40 with the grip cut down to the same size as the MK40.
I'm thinking that the reason that the MK40 is so concealable is the shorter grip (the grip is the part of my Steyr M40 that prints, but not the slide).
If the shorter slide of the MK doesn't increase concealability all that much then maybe there is an advantage to the full length slide of the K40 covert (longer barrel and longer sight radius should make for a more accurate gun).
Anyone of you guys out there fired both?
I'm wondering if I should just go ahead and get the less expensive K40 covert. (although I gotta admit the MK is just better looking then the K covert )