I've been looking at the Kahrs on the web, and looked at them more closely at a gun show this last weekend, and am interested in any comments anyone might have on the 9 vs the 40. I'm a little concerned the bite may be a little high with such a small 40 with a two-finger lower grip.
I like the idea of a 40 to complement my Glock 19, which I've found is just too big for year-round carry in the South. I like the idea of having a gun in every major ammo caliber, and I don't have a 40, hence my interest in the MK40. I'd keep the 19 for other uses.
TIA
JimR
I like the idea of a 40 to complement my Glock 19, which I've found is just too big for year-round carry in the South. I like the idea of having a gun in every major ammo caliber, and I don't have a 40, hence my interest in the MK40. I'd keep the 19 for other uses.
TIA
JimR