I know there are numerous Kahr threads here but the search function is down, plus I don't remember this exact subject being discussed.
I'm going to buy one of the steel Kahrs for concealed carry but just can't decide between the two models. There isn't a range near me that rents them so I can't try them out first.
Obviously the MK-9 is somewhat more concealable than the K-9, particulatly if you want a pocket carry gun. My main questions are, is there a significant difference in the way they shoot, ie, felt recoil, accuracy, etc.? Is the K-9 just too big for comfortable concealed carry when wearing minimal summer clothing? Finally, and I don't really expect anyone to know the answer to this, is the MK-9 as durable as the K-9? The K-9 was designed first and there is mention in their literature of testing a single example for 10,000 rounds. I wonder if that also applies to the MK-9 or are you giving up something for the size?
Thanks.
I'm going to buy one of the steel Kahrs for concealed carry but just can't decide between the two models. There isn't a range near me that rents them so I can't try them out first.
Obviously the MK-9 is somewhat more concealable than the K-9, particulatly if you want a pocket carry gun. My main questions are, is there a significant difference in the way they shoot, ie, felt recoil, accuracy, etc.? Is the K-9 just too big for comfortable concealed carry when wearing minimal summer clothing? Finally, and I don't really expect anyone to know the answer to this, is the MK-9 as durable as the K-9? The K-9 was designed first and there is mention in their literature of testing a single example for 10,000 rounds. I wonder if that also applies to the MK-9 or are you giving up something for the size?
Thanks.