JPFO's letter to BATFE's "Chief of Staff", didn't know they had one. Will he respond

alan

New member
ALERT FROM JEWS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FIREARMS OWNERSHIP
America's Aggressive Civil Rights Organization

November 13, 2006

JPFO ALERT: An Open Letter to Brian Benczkowski
ATF Chief of Staff

Dear Mr. Benczkowski,

We'd like to congratulate you on your new position as Chief
of Staff for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and
Explosives. As you know, the BATFE has experienced several
embarrassments recently, such as the discovery that agents
were improperly talking to the neighbors and relatives of
people who were buying firearms at Virginia gun shows. This
incident, as well as several related ones, prompted the
recent BATFE hearings in Congress.

There are also problems with your Firearms Technology
Branch, which arbitrarily designates certain firearms or
accessories as "legal" or "illegal". We say arbitrarily
because we have seen multiple instances of items that are
categorized as "legal" suddenly recategorized as "illegal"
months and even years later. Worse, owners of these items
are seldom notified that their once-legal property is
suddenly illegal. These law-abiding citizens become
"criminals" overnight, and are completely unaware of it!

The Firearms Technology Branch has also been known to
incompetently "test" firearms. In at least one case, the
testing agent declared a rifle to be an illegally modified
machine gun because he was able to force it to rapid-fire.
It was only after a third party disassembled the rifle that
it was found to have a malfunctioning part. To think that a
man's life, freedom, and livelihood rested on the findings
of the Firearms Technology Branch ... and the BATFE didn't
even bother to inspect the rifle. It's not entirely
surprising, of course, considering that the BATFE has no
written, standardized procedures for performing these
tests.

We know such improprieties will not knowingly be permitted
to take place on your watch. Additionally, we hope that you
will seriously examine the cases of the hundreds or more
firearms owners who may have been falsely imprisoned as a
result of these poorly-executed tests.

We would like to offer you a complimentary copy of our book
_"Gun Control": Gateway to Tyranny_, which illustrates the
connections between the 1968 Gun Control Act and the 1938
Nazi gun control laws. The two are eerily similar.
_Gateway_ also reproduces a letter from Louis Coffin at the
Library of Congress to Senator Thomas Dodd, who had a copy
of the original Nazi laws and wished for a translation.
Senator Dodd, it should be noted, was a primary author of
the 1968 GCA. Would you or the Justice Department be
willing to open an investigation into the use of Nazi laws
as a model for American gun laws that infringe on the
rights of Americans?

As evidenced above, the BATFE has been riddled with greed,
arrogance, dishonesty, and incompetence from its inception.
Despite numerous attempts at "reform", these problems still
exist, and as a result, we've come to believe that the best
"reform" would be total abolishment of this agency.

Although you may not initially agree with this proposal, we
ask that you seriously examine it. If nothing else, coming
from Congress, you might want to consider that the party
that ultimately abolishes the BATFE would be assured of
political power for decades -- 60 million gun owners would
respond favorably.

You may be aware that our organization is currently in
production on a new documentary entitled _The Gang: Using
the Law to Destroy Your Freedom and Security_. This film is
admittedly highly critical of the BATFE for many of the
reasons listed above. As we are still in production, we'd
like to offer you the opportunity to appear on camera for
the film. This would provide you with the freedom to
express your opinion and any disagreements you may have
with our view of the BATFE.

In closing, we ask that you please take the time to address
our concerns and let us know if you will pursue justice.

Sincerely,

Aaron Zelman
Executive Director
Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
www.jpfo.org
 
Great letter

Thanks for standing up for our rights, alan. We will see how he responds. I wish the NRA would the same. The GOA will, too. If some how the good groups could all work together...
 
A quick google search on this guy seems to point to him being a lawyer on the judiciary committee. I'm sure his first priority will be to fix all the wrongs at the ATF, right after he re-decorates his office.
It's a nice letter, but I doubt much will happen that we consider positive under his watch.
 
There are also problems with your Firearms Technology
Branch, which arbitrarily designates certain firearms or
accessories as "legal" or "illegal".

The Firearms Technology Branch has also been known to
incompetently "test" firearms.

Additionally, we hope that you
will seriously examine the cases of the hundreds or more
firearms owners who may have been falsely imprisoned as a
result of these poorly-executed tests.

Would you or the Justice Department be
willing to open an investigation into the use of Nazi laws
as a model for American gun laws that infringe on the
rights of Americans?

and my favorite:

As evidenced above, the BATFE has been riddled with greed,
arrogance, dishonesty, and incompetence from its inception.
Despite numerous attempts at "reform", these problems still
exist, and as a result, we've come to believe that the best
"reform" would be total abolishment of this agency.

Yeah thats going to do alot. That whole letter is the stupidest thing I have ever seen, and I for one would never support in any fashion the nutjobs that promulgated it.

WildwhatabunchofidiotsAlaska
 
I might get their DVD.

A ripped copy might show up on google video for those who want to critique the info without paying 20 bucks for a .59 cent plastic coaster. I'm of the opinion that if there were anything groundbreaking, they would be distributing information free a la Jim March.
 
JPFO has a very real place in the mix of firearms organizations we should support. They maintain a no compromise, no retreat policy. And while their rhetoric may be high at times, it is certainly not any grater than some of the NRA rants.

Don't write JPFO off your Christmas List. They do good work.
Rich
 
And while their rhetoric may be high at times, it is certainly not any grater than some of the NRA rants.

Thats why Im not an NRA member either...JBTs indeed.

WildbutirecognizetheireffectivenessAlaska
 
Wild-
OK, you donate to none of the major organizations that lobby for the 2nd Amendment. I'll accept that and the fact that you have your reasons.

But you happen to be POSTING on a Pro-Second site, using OUR bandwidth for your opinion. State it, by all means, but kindly include a disclaimer that explains that your money stays in your pocket when it comes to ALL such organizations.

Absent that info, I got the impression that your problem was only with JPFO.

Thanks-
Rich
 
Actually Rich, I use my dollars earmarked for "activism" for contributions to political candidates that I feel relect my values.

I have also sent money to NRA/ILA in conjunction with their alerts as to either legislation or political action, but only when I am convinced they are not crying wolf

I cant give money to ANY organization that takes a broad sweep on things and that stands for stuff I dont agree with. United Way, National Political parties, NRA, etc. I prefer local activism. I used to be an NRA member.....the stridency began to get to me.

Right now my "gun organization" is Ducks Unlimited, quack quack. One of my friends who is on the Board of Directors of the NRA has been hocking me to rejoin...sooner or later he will break me down I reckon...

My bitch with JPFO is, as you have staed, that they go over the top...I wish their was an organization that was a bit less...strident?


WildbesidesiwouldntjoinanythingthatwouldhavemeasamemberAlaska
 
Keep in mind, the BATFE can only enforce laws that Congress has passed and the President has signed. Heinrich Himmler could have authored the GCA of 1968, and there'd be nothing the BATFE could do but enforce it. It seems like the pro-2A movement would be better served through campaigning and lobbying, and not writing pointed, badgering letters to the 'feds'.
 
It's a letter that should be sent to BATFEces everytime they have a change of fuhrers.
However, anything said to them is basically whizzing into the wind as they have their own agenda and couldn't care less about what citizens think.
 
WA-
Ducks Unlimited?
You have to be kidding! I contribute also, but not on a Second Amendment basis. They defend the right to own high dollar shotguns and hunt a la Dick Cheney, all the while, amassing as much wetlands as possible into their own "Good Buddy, Come Hunt With Me" coffers. Plug in the words, "Second Amendment" to the search engine on their site; not a single relevant hit. They qualify as a Second Amendment group the way the National Organization of Teachers qualifies as a pro-education group.

Tell me, what has Ducks Unlimited done recently to support the Second Amendment?
Rich
 
JLelli wrote:

Keep in mind, the BATFE can only enforce laws that Congress has passed and the President has signed. Heinrich Himmler could have authored the GCA of 1968, and there'd be nothing the BATFE could do but enforce it. It seems like the pro-2A movement would be better served through campaigning and lobbying, and not writing pointed, badgering letters to the 'feds'.

-----------------------

The Congress has enacted some really poor examples of "legislation" which were then signed by variious presidents, Democratic as well as Republican. So far as I can tell, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, none of the above referenced legislation authorized a government agency, in this case BATFE, to TAMPER WITH EVIDENCE, as described "government documents" the BATFE firearms technicians written report, in the Kwan case, see Gun Week of October 10. There is also the Glover case, which was the subject of a JPFO DVD.

By the way, while JPFO might be, at times somewhat, "over the top", I believe that they are preferable to the ladies and gentlemen of the BATFE, except in cases where the activities of the above mentioned persons were were limited to the opening of envelopes and depositing of the checks therein, as with their collection of Alcohol and Tobacco taxes.

In any case, re the legislation that BATFE "enforces", I submit the following. They have taken a poor thing, and made it worse, much worse.
 
Last edited:
What a poorly-written letter.

If this guy is a lawyer he will not respond well to the ham-fisted, expansive language contained in this sorry document. They could have said the same things without calling gun-control proponents nazis or accusing the BATFE of gross negligence / intentional manipulation of evidence.

These guys are hungry to shoot themselves in the foot.
 
Why do you think it's an open letter. I was going to call it propaganda, but propaganda is a message directly aimed at influencing the opinions of people. Whose opinion is this going to influence? Not the Chief of Staff's. And JPFO could not have even thought it would influence him. It's not going to influence the opinions of anti-gun or pro-gun people. If anything it will just make readers more set in their thinking.

To be honest I don't know what to think of it. Nothing real could be accomplished with a private letter, so I think they just wrote this up and posted it as mental and literary masturbation.

I was thinking of joining though and I think I still will.
 
And some people wonder why Rabbi Mermelstein left the JPFO... But I digress!

Aaron Zelman is a zealot, if he is anything. That is not to say that being a zealot for the right to keep and bear arms is bad. Unfortunately, sometimes being a zealot means that one is rather narrow sighted... Not being able to see the forest for the trees.

The letter in question is poorly written. It makes several allegations without any proper citations as proof of the allegations. In short, it falls just short of a harassing communication by a fringe group. As such, it will be ignored.

Mr. Zelman is ordinarily very articulate. Mores the pity.... sigh...

[Fairness Disclosure: I have contributed in the past to the JPFO.]
 
Tell me, what has Ducks Unlimited done recently to support the Second Amendment?

Beats me, but the annual Dinners are great :)

Seriously, like I said, I confine my activism to sending $$ to selected state or local candidates, then at least they will listen to my smarmy letters. :)

WildneverthreateningalwysniceAlaska
 
Back
Top