Going out on a limb here
John and I have discussed this a little ... potentially touchy subject.
I don't know Jerry, whereas John does. I've had another RKBA supporter call me, and advise caution.
Here is the challenge - most of us have clear biases and low expectations of BATF. However, I'm sure they make some appropriate efforts. So, with a BATF investigation involving someone that you don't know personally, how do you decide if he is 'one of us'?
Please don't get me wrong - I'm not giving an opinion on this particular case, because I don't know the facts. I know what I've been told by a couple of acquaintances, and I've read a related document regarding the case.
But, the question is broader. I believe it is prudent to be cautious in supporting someone who has run afoul of the law. Most of the public has a kneejerk reaction that such folks are criminals ... and, due to our experience in the area, many of us have the opposite kneejerk reaction.
Everyone has to make their own judgement on such cases.
I hope things work out as they should in this case. If the man broke material criminal laws, then he should be charged and tried honestly. If he didn't, then his property should be returned. IMHO, asset seizures without charges are immoral and unethical. Let the truth come out in court.
Regards from AZ