Janet Reno won't investigate Gore-AGAIN!

Longshot

New member
This is being swept under the carpet.

Alert your reps - protest this via: http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm
(use the contact your reps/send message feature)
http://www.vny.com/cf/News/upidetail.cfm?QID=118228

No new Gore probe at DOJ

Friday, 15 September 2000 14:21 (ET)


No new Gore probe at DOJ
By MICHAEL KIRKLAND

WASHINGTON, Sept. 15 (UPI) - Contrary to reports, the Justice Department is not investigating allegations that Vice President Gore illegally solicited campaign donations from Texas trial lawyers for the1996 election, U.S. officials told United Press International Friday.

The officials said investigators reviewed the material several years ago and decided that no crime had been committed. "They just decided there was nothing there," one official said.

The official conceded that the reports on the revived material could prove politically embarrassing to the Democratic presidential nominee only two months before the general election, "but that's politics."

Attorney General Janet Reno refused to comment directly on a flurry of news reports about the alleged fund-raising that appeared this week, but added that such allegations were likely to surface the closer the nation gets to the election. "I just think that we should be very careful," Reno said.

Speaking on background to UPI, another U.S. official said there is no "preliminary review" by the Justice Department Campaign Financing Task Force of the allegations against Gore, and one is unlikely unless Reno
specifically asks for a fresh look at the evidence, which she hasn't done so far.

Several media stories this week said Gore was asked by the Democratic National Committee to solicit money from Texas liability lawyers just weeks before President Clinton was scheduled to veto a bill limiting damages in
product-liability cases.

One document given to reporters by unnamed sources showed a notation from an aide for the Democratic National Committee advising a potential donor to give a $100,000 contribution before the president vetoed the legislation, not after.

None of the media reports showed Gore actually making any of the requested
calls.

Even if he had, U.S. officials said, there didn't appear to be any crime connected to the calls. "If the (donation) recipient doesn't say, 'I'm only going to veto this bill if you give us a contribution,' it isn't a quid pro quo," one official said.

The material used in the news reports has been in the hands of Justice Department investigators and Congress for several years.



------------------
NRA/GOA/SAF/USMC

Oregon residents please support the Oregon Firearms Federation, our only "No compromise" gun lobby. http://www.oregonfirearms.org
 
LongShot, isn't this a be-otch! You are under investigation because of some thief and you'll probably have your life opened up for the feds to see (whether you wish it or not) but if you're the vp then "we just don't see anything there". You should have run for president, then you can be above the law and get all the drugs/sex/murders you wish. (I would put the :Mad: thing here but it didn't work for me last time).

USP45usp

American's... they want a crook, a liar, a thief as their role model; what a sad state we live in.

Maybe we should all do our DUTY (reference Alan Keyes for that one).
 
Surely you guys didn't expect anything else, did you? Reischfuhrer/SS Reno, is completely controlled by King Klinton and his toadies.

J.B.
 
As Chris Matthews said as the host of "Hardball" on MSNBC, "If you're Al Gore, who needs a lawyer when you have Janet Reno as your attorney general?"

Considering Matthews is liberal I nearly fell off my perch when I heard it.
 
Why are you surprised? I'm not.

Does it make sense? No! Is it consistent behavior? Oh, yea!



------------------
Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.

Barry Goldwater--1964
 
While this Reno decision is infuriating, it's SOP for her for the last four years. What really galls me is the lack of media coverage. I spent the afternoon with a neighbor who's as much of a news junkie as I am. He didn't know the details of the allegations! (He's a Nader voter). If Peter Jennings doesn't report it, it never happened. And if Jennings didn't report it and it thus didn't happen, then why should Reno investigate something that the media said didn't happen? Her time would be better served investigating why the word "rats" turned up in a commercial criticizing the DemocRATS presidential nominee.

%$*#$*!()$*%&@#%(@&%&

Dick
Want to send a message to Bush? Sign the petition at http://www.petitiononline.com/monk/petition.html and forward the link to every gun owner you know.
 
:rolleyes:

------------------
God, Guns and Guts made this country a great country!

oberkommando sez:
"We lost the first and third and now they are after the Second!(no pun intended)"
 
Back
Top