OK, I got called out and couldn't reply to this yesterday.
Donny gave a post reply to The Jane Fonda Question quoting the 14th Ammendment to the Constitution of the United States. He says that she could not hold office because of her North Vietnam involvements.
Now this makes me wonder how William Jefferson Clinton became President after his Vietnam protest on Russian soil of his country. I don't see a difference. Can someone help me out on this one?
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Or was this story just some right-wing conspirisy to discredit Klinton?
I have always been told this story, does anyone have a copy of it?
PROSOUTH
Donny gave a post reply to The Jane Fonda Question quoting the 14th Ammendment to the Constitution of the United States. He says that she could not hold office because of her North Vietnam involvements.
Now this makes me wonder how William Jefferson Clinton became President after his Vietnam protest on Russian soil of his country. I don't see a difference. Can someone help me out on this one?
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Or was this story just some right-wing conspirisy to discredit Klinton?
I have always been told this story, does anyone have a copy of it?
PROSOUTH