It's Clinton in trouble again!

M

MADISON

New member
Of those 140 he pardoned before he left there was one fellow who was caught off the "10 Most Wanted" list and convicted. His wife or girlfriend donated 1 million dollars to Hillery's senate campaigh. He pardened to poor man. Congress is calling for an investigation, acusing him of selling justice.

If this practice is upheld by the courts, how much freedon would $100 buy?
 
The courts can't do a thing. Presidential pardons are beyond question, unless Congress convenes a full inquiry. This isn't bad news, it's great news. There isn't a Clinton defender who isn't outraged (at least on paper) about this. Even Commisarette Margarette Carlson is shocked. After eight years of this kind of backroom money laundering, it's out there and distilled in a form the public can understand. Clinton wanted a legacy? Hey, Willy, you got it.

Dick
 
At this point I would not assume that the courts cannot do a thing about this. We don't know the full story about all the money transactions between the Clintons and this man. With Clinton, nothing is as it first appears. That's were the crime, if one occured, was committed, not in the pardon itself.
It would be good to have a full investigation of this matter.
 
Constitutionally, Clinton may pardon whomever he wishes as long as it isn't himself. No court may question him. It was thought the responsibility of the electorate to elect a man of honor. If they failed their responsibility, the Electoral College was supposed to disregard the popular vote and elect a man of honor. Both of these having failed, it was up to Congress to police the executive branch through the power of the purse and the powers of impeachment.

The problem isn't that Clinton had no honor, dignity or vision. The problem is that the American people, Electoral college, and the Congress thought that it was OK for him not to have the traits of a good moral leader. The American people get the leader they deserve. Unfortunately I get the leader they deserve too.

I hope you're not under any allusions that this was somehow the worst thing to happen in the past eight years. Some scandals that have been whispered about will come out under the full light of day. Many a rumor will be confirmed. When all of this is over, and we know how much of a cad the man was, I fear the American people still won't care diddley-squat about his morals. Remember Nero? While being religious doesn't make a good leader, being moral is indispensable to a public leader of the magnitude of President.

It isn't that Clinton failed. The American people failed.
 
I have a feeling that they will keep this under wraps until it get's closer to the time when Hillary puts in her bid for President. Then they will publicize this to cut her off at the knee's. Until then they have time to do their homework and nail her good.
 
Dick Cheney was on Fox News Sunday and was asked about that. If I remember correctly, he said they would be looking into it.

Juan Willaims, the perennial apologist was even disgusted with the looting that went on, but ended up saying what Clinton did wasn't illegal, but "he pushed the envelope".

Brit Hume made a scathing statement about that. He said (paraphrased) that Clinton had a right to take the stuff people had given him. "Don't forget, the liberal community still loves him and think that all of the sleazy things he did were right and proper - they all think that way".

There's a great opinion piece in the Orlando Sentinel by our boy Charley Reese. He was rhapsodic. It starts off, "The air smells sweeter. Food tastes better. There is once more a spring in my step. What happened?

The inauguration of George W. Bush and the departure of Bill Clinton and his sleazy band of incompetents."

It gets better.

Check it out at: CHARLEY REESE



[Edited by Oatka on 01-28-2001 at 08:42 PM]
 
Wow, there's hope for my grab at the presidency... At $1 millon a pardon, how many drug dealers do I have to pardon to get elected? Now I wish I had paid attention to those math problems in grade school.
 
He could pardon whoever he wanted to pardon. As president, that's okay. He won't get in any trouble for what he did.

Clinton will, however, get in trouble soon enough. Perhaps in the next year or so, since he's not the center of attraction and doesn't have a whole crowd of people fawning over him and covering his tracks, he'll do something stupid and have to pay the price. Living in his wife's new home and following in his wife's shadow will definitely get the best of this egomaniac.

He's probably going nuts already since no one is interested in his daily activities anymore...
 
Think about this!

This guy, Marc Rich, initially went to Switzerland and took litterly millions of $$ with him. He is now a citizen of Spain. He has made even many more millions in the past 16 years since leaving the country...Lots of $$ probably all hidden in obvious ways.

Now comes Clinton and this pardon of Rich at the 11th hour with no real paperwork, totally back doored.

Put them both together and what does it mean to me...UNNUMBERED SWISS BANK ACCOUNT!!

Clinton (or the media as I recall)is even talking about taking some high job in the new world order scheme. Put it all together, follow the money (if you can). My opinion is that the slim ball sold the pardon to Rich and he has used the Presidency once more to line his pocket.

Am I thinking straight, or am I delusional?
 
KJM is on the money!!!!! We got what we deserved - when the american sheeple....er, I mean people....said that "Character does not count", we got Bill Clinton. Just goes to show you, you can't take the boy out of the trailer park........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top