I've wanted an AR-15 for a while, but haven't had the nerve to part with the cash.
I'm interested in a carbine, because I already have an M1A giving me long-range capability, and a Mossberg 590 for home defense. Probable uses include plinking, rural home defense & SHTF scenarios, and to have because "they" don't want me to.
I'm a purist, and I've wanted a pre-ban rifle, almost entirely for the authentic flash suppressor (the collapsible stock is cute but unnecessary in my mind). I suppose this is the part where I question my sanity. The still-rational core of my brain knows that I can get an equivalent post-ban rifle for a little more than half pre-ban cost (here in San Antonio).
So please, to beat a dead horse a bit further, convince me that there are other advantages to a pre-ban rifle, or that I can live with a naked muzzle or ugly muzzle brake, and spend the extra money on ammo and accessories.
Thanks,
SA Scott
[This message has been edited by SA Scott (edited October 09, 2000).]
I'm interested in a carbine, because I already have an M1A giving me long-range capability, and a Mossberg 590 for home defense. Probable uses include plinking, rural home defense & SHTF scenarios, and to have because "they" don't want me to.
I'm a purist, and I've wanted a pre-ban rifle, almost entirely for the authentic flash suppressor (the collapsible stock is cute but unnecessary in my mind). I suppose this is the part where I question my sanity. The still-rational core of my brain knows that I can get an equivalent post-ban rifle for a little more than half pre-ban cost (here in San Antonio).
So please, to beat a dead horse a bit further, convince me that there are other advantages to a pre-ban rifle, or that I can live with a naked muzzle or ugly muzzle brake, and spend the extra money on ammo and accessories.
Thanks,
SA Scott
[This message has been edited by SA Scott (edited October 09, 2000).]