Indrid Cold
New member
Well, it just hit the CNN front page that the US found a link between Iran and the deaths of ~170 U.S Soldiers in Iraq. Iran denies it, says that the US fabricated evidence, yadda yadda...
Needless to say, this bothers me. I know I'm in the minority of opinion here, being fairly liberal in a lot of my views, but I know these forums aren't a place of political bashing either way and I'm totally open to hearing both sides. Here's my take:
I'm not against war. I think it's one of those things that has to happen every once and a while to right the wrongs of the world. Is it a good thing? No, I don't think you're going to justify war as being good. It's one of those "better of two evils" situations. I was completely for going into Afghanistan. Not as much for Iraq, but I'll support the troops, and I'm not advocating pulling out immediately as I think that's a horrible plan both for Iraq and the U.S. It's a surefire way to throw Iraq into civil war and leave us with a horrible reputation and a massive debt (both financial, and in terms of loss of life) for an idea that wasn't realized.
Iran presents a new trouble for us. I *really* dislike Iran right now, and a host of other Iran-supporting countries. The be quite frank, their conduct is pissing me off. They're the temper-tantrum throwing little kid that just wants to make a lot of noise. Unfortunately, as the news has reported (correctly or incorrectly, but that's a whole other story) they've started to actively/indirectly kill our soldiers instead of blow smoke. Now, I see that as a full on declaration of war if it's true. But... This is one situation where I would really hate to see us get involved. Not only is Iran better armed than Iraq (Although we're more than capable of bombing them to oblivion), but I think they've got a lot more support from the Muslim world and outside of it. I think if we got involved with Iran, it would be a s***storm of epic proportions. Too many people would see it (incorrectly) as an assault on a religion and a people, and not a retaliatory measure in response to one country's agression. To be blunt, this is a mess - It's kicking a hornets' nest. I'm not saying that we shouldn't do anything, but I don't think it should involve troops. At this point, I'm for working with other nations to financially cut Iran off from everything we possibly can and send them back to pre-stone age. If they want to rot in the desert as a pariah nation, fine. Let them.
Let me throw this out on the floor though - I'm not saying that I don't think Iran's involvement in Iraq doesn't justify the use of force. I'm saying that for our own financial and political interests, and the stability of the political world as a whole, I think we should play the bigger power and let this one go without full-on retribution.
Thoughts? I'm not sure I articulated all of my thoughts on the issue fully, so if something comes up that I hadn't thought of at the moment, I'll be sure to post. Looking forward to hearing your views.
Needless to say, this bothers me. I know I'm in the minority of opinion here, being fairly liberal in a lot of my views, but I know these forums aren't a place of political bashing either way and I'm totally open to hearing both sides. Here's my take:
I'm not against war. I think it's one of those things that has to happen every once and a while to right the wrongs of the world. Is it a good thing? No, I don't think you're going to justify war as being good. It's one of those "better of two evils" situations. I was completely for going into Afghanistan. Not as much for Iraq, but I'll support the troops, and I'm not advocating pulling out immediately as I think that's a horrible plan both for Iraq and the U.S. It's a surefire way to throw Iraq into civil war and leave us with a horrible reputation and a massive debt (both financial, and in terms of loss of life) for an idea that wasn't realized.
Iran presents a new trouble for us. I *really* dislike Iran right now, and a host of other Iran-supporting countries. The be quite frank, their conduct is pissing me off. They're the temper-tantrum throwing little kid that just wants to make a lot of noise. Unfortunately, as the news has reported (correctly or incorrectly, but that's a whole other story) they've started to actively/indirectly kill our soldiers instead of blow smoke. Now, I see that as a full on declaration of war if it's true. But... This is one situation where I would really hate to see us get involved. Not only is Iran better armed than Iraq (Although we're more than capable of bombing them to oblivion), but I think they've got a lot more support from the Muslim world and outside of it. I think if we got involved with Iran, it would be a s***storm of epic proportions. Too many people would see it (incorrectly) as an assault on a religion and a people, and not a retaliatory measure in response to one country's agression. To be blunt, this is a mess - It's kicking a hornets' nest. I'm not saying that we shouldn't do anything, but I don't think it should involve troops. At this point, I'm for working with other nations to financially cut Iran off from everything we possibly can and send them back to pre-stone age. If they want to rot in the desert as a pariah nation, fine. Let them.
Let me throw this out on the floor though - I'm not saying that I don't think Iran's involvement in Iraq doesn't justify the use of force. I'm saying that for our own financial and political interests, and the stability of the political world as a whole, I think we should play the bigger power and let this one go without full-on retribution.
Thoughts? I'm not sure I articulated all of my thoughts on the issue fully, so if something comes up that I hadn't thought of at the moment, I'll be sure to post. Looking forward to hearing your views.