A while back on TFL in Tactics and Training, I remember somebody posting a thread advocating an idea his CHL instructor told him that it was a good idea for a CHLer to get a badge and hold it up when you see a crime committed saying "CHL holder, call the police" as nobody can see a CHL license from a distance.
Now, I am not trying to bring back up that particular thread (it was closed because the moderator considered it a bad idea). Everybody, myself included, seemed to agree it was a bad idea. But for different reasons. I was kind of amused. "CHL holder, call the police" ??? Most people don't even know what a CHLer or license itself is and would think "he's a what?" A badge seemed absolutely pointless to me and would mean even less than a CHL license to most people out there. Other people on the thread seemed to think it pointless as well.
Other people however said that he could be arrested for impersonating a police officer if he was carrying a badge. If people see you with a badge and a gun they will assume you are a cop. Which brings up the point of my thread.
In my mind, there is a big and legal difference between you impersonating a cop and someone assuming you are a cop.
In the minds of some in that thread, just people assuming you are a cop is considered impersonating. But if you follow that line of thinking all the way, then a fireman can be considered impersonating a cop. Their official uniforms resemble police uniforms to some extent. Heck, there are a lot of official uniforms out there from ordinary guys wearing blue shirts and black pants to exterminators, to meter readers to UPS guys to security guards. All of which if the casual observer looked could conceivably consider them a policeman and ask for aid. Heck if they saw your gun in some way they could assume you are a policeman.
In my mind, if a man walks up and identifiys himself as a policeman, flashes a badge or purposefully presents himself physically or verbally as a policeman of some kind then that is what impersonating a police officer is. It is an attempt to deceive.
Someone assuming you are a policeman is not you attempting to deceive but someone mistaking you for something you are not. The fault is theirs not yours.
What say ya'll?
Now, I am not trying to bring back up that particular thread (it was closed because the moderator considered it a bad idea). Everybody, myself included, seemed to agree it was a bad idea. But for different reasons. I was kind of amused. "CHL holder, call the police" ??? Most people don't even know what a CHLer or license itself is and would think "he's a what?" A badge seemed absolutely pointless to me and would mean even less than a CHL license to most people out there. Other people on the thread seemed to think it pointless as well.
Other people however said that he could be arrested for impersonating a police officer if he was carrying a badge. If people see you with a badge and a gun they will assume you are a cop. Which brings up the point of my thread.
In my mind, there is a big and legal difference between you impersonating a cop and someone assuming you are a cop.
In the minds of some in that thread, just people assuming you are a cop is considered impersonating. But if you follow that line of thinking all the way, then a fireman can be considered impersonating a cop. Their official uniforms resemble police uniforms to some extent. Heck, there are a lot of official uniforms out there from ordinary guys wearing blue shirts and black pants to exterminators, to meter readers to UPS guys to security guards. All of which if the casual observer looked could conceivably consider them a policeman and ask for aid. Heck if they saw your gun in some way they could assume you are a policeman.
In my mind, if a man walks up and identifiys himself as a policeman, flashes a badge or purposefully presents himself physically or verbally as a policeman of some kind then that is what impersonating a police officer is. It is an attempt to deceive.
Someone assuming you are a policeman is not you attempting to deceive but someone mistaking you for something you are not. The fault is theirs not yours.
What say ya'll?
Last edited: