If this is true, Orwell would be jealous.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wildcard

Moderator
Agents' visit chills UMass Dartmouth senior
By AARON NICODEMUS, Standard-Times staff writer

NEW BEDFORD -- A senior at UMass Dartmouth was visited by federal agents two months ago, after he requested a copy of Mao Tse-Tung's tome on Communism called "The Little Red Book."
Two history professors at UMass Dartmouth, Brian Glyn Williams and Robert Pontbriand, said the student told them he requested the book through the UMass Dartmouth library's interlibrary loan program.
The student, who was completing a research paper on Communism for Professor Pontbriand's class on fascism and totalitarianism, filled out a form for the request, leaving his name, address, phone number and Social Security number. He was later visited at his parents' home in New Bedford by two agents of the Department of Homeland Security, the professors said.
The professors said the student was told by the agents that the book is on a "watch list," and that his background, which included significant time abroad, triggered them to investigate the student further.
"I tell my students to go to the direct source, and so he asked for the official Peking version of the book," Professor Pontbriand said. "Apparently, the Department of Homeland Security is monitoring inter-library loans, because that's what triggered the visit, as I understand it."
Although The Standard-Times knows the name of the student, he is not coming forward because he fears repercussions should his name become public. He has not spoken to The Standard-Times.
The professors had been asked to comment on a report that President Bush had authorized the National Security Agency to spy on as many as 500 people at any given time since 2002 in this country.
The eavesdropping was apparently done without warrants.
The Little Red Book, is a collection of quotations and speech excerpts from Chinese leader Mao Tse-Tung.
In the 1950s and '60s, during the Cultural Revolution in China, it was required reading. Although there are abridged versions available, the student asked for a version translated directly from the original book.
The student told Professor Pontbriand and Dr. Williams that the Homeland Security agents told him the book was on a "watch list." They brought the book with them, but did not leave it with the student, the professors said.
Dr. Williams said in his research, he regularly contacts people in Afghanistan, Chechnya and other Muslim hot spots, and suspects that some of his calls are monitored.
"My instinct is that there is a lot more monitoring than we think," he said.
Dr. Williams said he had been planning to offer a course on terrorism next semester, but is reconsidering, because it might put his students at risk.
"I shudder to think of all the students I've had monitoring al-Qaeda Web sites, what the government must think of that," he said. "Mao Tse-Tung is completely harmless."

http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/12-05/12-17-05/a09lo650.htm
 
I'm usually very suspicious of anonymous sources who rely on a third party to give their story.

Especially considering when you look at the number of Dartmouth students with lots of foreign travel visited for checking out a certain book, I'm guessing that they could identify this student with or without his name.
 
I'm usually very suspicious of anonymous sources who rely on a third party to give their story.

Especially considering when you look at the number of Dartmouth students with lots of foreign travel visited for checking out a certain book, I'm guessing that they could identify this student with or without his name.

I agree, thats why I said, IF this is true.
 
Something smells fishy...

Two history professors at UMass Dartmouth, Brian Glyn Williams and Robert Pontbriand, said the student told them he requested the book through the UMass Dartmouth library's interlibrary loan program.
Although The Standard-Times knows the name of the student, he is not coming forward because he fears repercussions should his name become public. He has not spoken to The Standard-Times.

Ahh, there it is.

However, if this is true, then '1987' is what comes to my mind also.
 
I'm usually very suspicious of anonymous sources who rely on a third party to give their story.
Yes, but this fits the agenda of the poster.
thumb.gif
 
Huh?

"However, if this is true, then '1987' is what comes to my mind also."


Why? Orwell's book was entitled "1984."
 
Yes, but this fits the agenda of the poster

I guess you skipped reading comprehension in school. The words "IF THIS IS TRUE". Should clue you in.


Guess it irks you that your agenda and mine differ.
 
Guess it irks you that your agenda and mine differ.
If something were to "irk" me it would be a poster's willingness to put up material that any reasonable person would clearly see as "suspect" at the very least, and much worse at the most.

But that's okay, as it speaks to character and credibility.

Keep up the good work.
thumb.gif
 
TBO, this is Wildcards home game version of fantasy island.

Wildcard states - I'm no cop hater but..... almost every thread i initiate has something to do with LE, I've claimed to have been on many "shifts" but when challenged on it - i slink away in the vastness of cyberspace, knowing that my claims can never be fully verified.

Wildcard - Bona fides???? - got any....;)

Merry Christmas.

12-34hom.
 
i slink away in the vastness of cyberspace, knowing that my claims can never be fully verified.


You are correct, my job history is not any of your business. My opinions stand on their own. I sure dont have to prove anything to a Reserve LEO that probably rides maybe 12 hours a month. If you want to be a cop, be one, dont sit on the safety fence.
 
Wildcard, ever look at TFL's tag line?

More signal - less noise.

Good advice for folks like yourself.

Happy holidays!

12-34hom.
 
Yep, I am a anti cop bigot, because I dare to question the actions, corruption and cover ups in law enforcement. I seem to remember a stink you, and other LEO's caused on GlockTalk. Your so called Troll patrol. Anyone that questioned LEO's actions was attacked and labeled a troll. You all even made up cute little avatars to support and highlight your bias.


Think what you will. If you are an honest LEO, protect citizens rights, and shine a light on LEO's who are corrupt, god bless you. You have my support.

If you are an LEO who is dishonest, aid in covering up/corruption (either directly or indirectly by defending actions of officers that are corrupt), then worry, get mad, demand that I stop posting, attack my character. Must have hit a nerve there TBO and 12 34. Guilty conscious maybe?
 
The FBI came calling in Windsor, Conn., this summer with a document marked for delivery by hand. On Matianuk Avenue, across from the tennis courts, two special agents found their man. They gave George Christian the letter, which warned him to tell no one, ever, what it said.

Under the shield and stars of the FBI crest, the letter directed Christian to surrender "all subscriber information, billing information and access logs of any person" who used a specific computer at a library branch some distance away. Christian, who manages digital records for three dozen Connecticut libraries, said in an affidavit that he configures his system for privacy. But the vendors of the software he operates said their databases can reveal the Web sites that visitors browse, the e-mail accounts they open and the books they borrow.

The FBI now issues more than 30,000 national security letters a year, according to government sources, a hundredfold increase over historic norms. The letters -- one of which can be used to sweep up the records of many people -- are extending the bureau's reach as never before into the telephone calls, correspondence and financial lives of ordinary Americans.

Issued by FBI field supervisors, national security letters do not need the imprimatur of a prosecutor, grand jury or judge. They receive no review after the fact by the Justice Department or Congress. The executive branch maintains only statistics, which are incomplete and confined to classified reports. The Bush administration defeated legislation and a lawsuit to require a public accounting, and has offered no example in which the use of a national security letter helped disrupt a terrorist plot.

In late 2003, the Bush administration reversed a long-standing policy requiring agents to destroy their files on innocent American citizens, companies and residents when investigations closed. Late last month, President Bush signed Executive Order 13388, expanding access to those files for "state, local and tribal" governments and for "appropriate private sector entities," which are not defined.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/05/AR2005110501366.html
 
Yep, I am a anti cop bigot, (true) because I dare to question the actions, corruption and cover ups in law enforcement. (no, it's because you choose a particular path, and are given to any negative story, no matter how shakey the source. It's also the ONLY message you put out) I seem to remember a stink you, and other LEO's caused on GlockTalk. Your so called Troll patrol. Anyone that questioned LEO's actions was attacked and labeled a troll. You all even made up cute little avatars to support and highlight your bias. (source? lacking one, I'll accept an appology and retraction)


Think what you will. If you are an honest LEO, protect citizens rights, and shine a light on LEO's who are corrupt, god bless you. You have my support. (but never my comments, threads, or posts, merely "lip service" right here and now)

If you are an LEO who is dishonest, aid in covering up/corruption (either directly or indirectly by defending actions of officers that are corrupt), then worry, get mad, demand that I stop posting, attack my character. Must have hit a nerve there TBO and 12 34. Guilty conscious maybe? (nice attempt to duck your responsibilty. Attacking me and 12 34? Must have hit a nerve calling you on your conduct, eh?)


Happy Holidays!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top