HiltonFarmer
New member
Just recently, a school board trustee in Vancouver, BC (Canada) wrote the Prime Minister and asked him why it was that she could be issued a CCW in the state of Utah and carry her firearm in 30 other states but she did not have the right to carry her firearm in a concealed manner in Canada? I would have to admit I have wondered that very same thing.
One politician claims that we as civilized people don't carry guns to resolve social issues. Excuse me?! Has this guy ever been threatened within an inch of his life? By his statement I would think not. The police say that the reason they're being paid is to protect the public and the public doesn't need to carry a concealed firearm. Hmmmmm. Guess they might be missing the bigger picture here or are politically motivated to say what they did. In any event, the firearms association in Canada is telling the public this is a good thing and that more women should be speaking up for their right to carry a concealed weapon.
Agree or disagree. Not really a question but more of an observation. Seems kind of problematic if we only allowed the feminine persuasion to carry a concealed weapon. The association should have made sure we took the gender rationalization out of it and said we should all have the right to bear arms. Call your local politician and tell him you want your rights!
Firstly, the majority of Canadians aren't raised with firearms the way our American couterparts are and of those that are are handling firearms, the majority are long arms. Secondly, we have so many restrictions attached to the acquisition of a firearm, most can't be bothered with all the red tape. (glad I did though). Then there are the categories of prohibited firearms that starts with a minimum barrel length of 105mm (4.14"). You cannot own a tazer or other non lethal defence device such as this. Hell, if a girl is found with capsicum in her purse because they're going out for dinner and dancing and she wants to ensure her safety in the event of, they're put through the ringer by the local LE. If a hunter is found with it in their possession, nothing is thought about it. Carry on.
Now my personal view point is that we should all have the right to protect ourselves from harm caused by another individual. In Canada, you have NO such right. Even if you beat the assailant who wants your wallet, car and wife with a stick you found on the side of the road, you're the one being charged and the the other party walks. And by the way, it takes our local constabulary at least 15 minutes to arrive because they are under manned. They were supposed to be able to protect the public! Something wrong with that scenario isn't there?
The bad guys are running around with illegal automatic weapons and we might as well be using a leather sling with rocks to protect ourselves (and you only get one rock).
If the need to protect myself arises, I'll be forced to roll over and beg for mercy because I never had time to load my sling. Maybe they'll let me live!
The price you pay for the place you live I guess.
HiltonFarmer
One politician claims that we as civilized people don't carry guns to resolve social issues. Excuse me?! Has this guy ever been threatened within an inch of his life? By his statement I would think not. The police say that the reason they're being paid is to protect the public and the public doesn't need to carry a concealed firearm. Hmmmmm. Guess they might be missing the bigger picture here or are politically motivated to say what they did. In any event, the firearms association in Canada is telling the public this is a good thing and that more women should be speaking up for their right to carry a concealed weapon.
Agree or disagree. Not really a question but more of an observation. Seems kind of problematic if we only allowed the feminine persuasion to carry a concealed weapon. The association should have made sure we took the gender rationalization out of it and said we should all have the right to bear arms. Call your local politician and tell him you want your rights!
Firstly, the majority of Canadians aren't raised with firearms the way our American couterparts are and of those that are are handling firearms, the majority are long arms. Secondly, we have so many restrictions attached to the acquisition of a firearm, most can't be bothered with all the red tape. (glad I did though). Then there are the categories of prohibited firearms that starts with a minimum barrel length of 105mm (4.14"). You cannot own a tazer or other non lethal defence device such as this. Hell, if a girl is found with capsicum in her purse because they're going out for dinner and dancing and she wants to ensure her safety in the event of, they're put through the ringer by the local LE. If a hunter is found with it in their possession, nothing is thought about it. Carry on.
Now my personal view point is that we should all have the right to protect ourselves from harm caused by another individual. In Canada, you have NO such right. Even if you beat the assailant who wants your wallet, car and wife with a stick you found on the side of the road, you're the one being charged and the the other party walks. And by the way, it takes our local constabulary at least 15 minutes to arrive because they are under manned. They were supposed to be able to protect the public! Something wrong with that scenario isn't there?
The bad guys are running around with illegal automatic weapons and we might as well be using a leather sling with rocks to protect ourselves (and you only get one rock).
If the need to protect myself arises, I'll be forced to roll over and beg for mercy because I never had time to load my sling. Maybe they'll let me live!
The price you pay for the place you live I guess.
HiltonFarmer